COUNCIL OF STATE, SEC. V, No. 28 February 2011 1271
ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE
The Council of State in the courts (Section Five) gives the following
Judgement on the appeal to General Ledger number 4060 of 2007, proposed by :
Lacarbonara Vito, represented and defended by the lawyer. Antonella Giglio, Alfredo Passaro, with an address at Antonella Giglio in Rome, Via Antonio Gramsci, 14;
against
Leporano Municipality, represented and defended by the lawyer. Christmas Airo ', with an address at Roberto Masiani in Rome, Piazza Adriana, 5;
per la riforma
della sentenza del T.A.R. PUGLIA - SEZ. STACCATA DI LECCE: SEZIONE III n. 00623/2007, resa tra le parti, concernente RISARCIMENTO DANNO DA RITARDO NEL RILASCIO PERMESSO DI COSTRUIRE.
Visti il ricorso in appello e i relativi allegati;
Viste le memorie difensive;
Visti tutti gli atti della causa;
Relatore nell'udienza pubblica del giorno 3 dicembre 2010 il Cons. Roberto Chieppa e uditi per le parti gli avvocati Giglio e Masiani, su delega dell' avv. Airò;
Ritenuto e considerato in fatto e diritto quanto segue.
FATTO e DIRITTO
1. Con sentenza n. 623/2007 il Tar per la Puglia, sezione di Lecce, ha respinto il ricorso proposto dal signor Vito Lacarbonara, che aveva chiesto la condanna del comune di Leporano al risarcimento dei danni derivanti dall’illegittimo ritardo nel rilascio del permesso di costruire in variante, richiesto dal ricorrente in data 27.12.2001.
Vito Lacarbonara ha proposto ricorso in appello avverso tale sentenza per i motivi che saranno di seguito esaminati.
Il comune di Leporano si è costituito in giudizio, chiedendo la reiezione del ricorso.
Con ordinanza n. 172/2010 questa Sezione ha ritenuto necessario disporre due consulenze tecniche di ufficio al fine di accertare:
a) il pregiudizio economico subito dall’appellante per effetto del ritardo nel rilascio del permesso di costruire in questione, to relate to the period May 2002 to May 2004, stating in particular:
- the date of conclusion of individual contracts and preliminary and final contracts concluded by the impact of delay on the conclusion of each contract;
- quantification of loss of interest bank received by the appellant as a result of the delay in the payment of fees payable upon conclusion of final contracts or further amounts paid by the same appellant the interest due to debts not extinguished or reduced because of the delay in signing of final contracts ;
- the quantification of the total capital which he has suffered injury as a result of that delay, also evaluated with regard to the whole of its assets.
b) the existence of the disease and alteration of mental status, alleged by the applicant, with date of onset and the existence or not of the causal relation to the delay in issuing the permit to build and quantification of the relative damage. Upon completion of the two
advice and filed reports, today's hearing, the case was retained in the decision.
2. The issue in this case consists of a claim for compensation for damage allegedly derived the Appellant due to the delay of the town of Leporano in issuing a permit to build variant.
I danni lamentati concernono le conseguenze derivanti dal ritardo nella stipulazione dei contratti definitivi di acquisto degli immobili da costruire, già oggetto di contratti preliminari e il danno biologico subito per effetto delle patologie insorte in conseguenza della condotta omissiva dell’amministrazione.
Il giudice di primo grado ha respinto la domanda risarcitoria, ritenendo che, pur essendo assolutamente indubbio il superamento del termine per il rilascio del permesso di costruire previsto dall’art. 20, 3°- 8° comma, del d.p.r. n. 380/2001 ed individuato in 75 giorni dal ricevimento della domanda (60 per l’istruttoria e 15 per l’emanazione dell’atto), deve essere escluso il requisito soggettivo proof of guilt on the part of the administration as a result of a particular complexity of the case and a series of eventualities that can not be attributed to the municipal administration of Leporano. The Tar
drew the following factors in order to prevent a finding of guilt of the pa:
a) the fact that the practice of construction drawings and lacked the necessary consent of Superintendence for the architectural and landscape of Puglia, documentation gained with the procedure only on 22.2.2002 (note prot. No 1739);
b) detecting the presence of two opinions expressed by the Superintendence for the architectural and landscape of Apulia, again on 18.2.2002 ( and bearing protocol numbers 3149/01 and 6883/01); detection that caused the municipal administration of Leporano (note 12/03/2002 prot. No 2388) to direct the applicant a request for exhibition of works annexed to the opinion prot. No 6883/01 (required only by the person found on 04/08/2002)
c) the need to coordinate the two opinions of the Superintendence for Architectural Heritage and the countryside of Puglia, expressed with reference to several drawings;
d ) the recognition of a contrast between the opinion prot. No 31914/01 expressed by the Superintendent and the order of entry for 24.2.2001; contrast that was resolved, after two reminders of the municipal administration, with the only known 04/18/2003 prot. No 5427 of the Superintendence for Architectural Heritage and the countryside of Puglia, and
) a request for legal advice the lawyer. Mauro Ruffo, on 05/15/2002, request not successful for reasons of incompatibility with the note sent by the legal 15.7.2002 prot. No 7031;
f) the recognition of the insufficient identification, in the drawings of the floor and an "excessive invasion of the public sidewalks with ramps scale" survey which was substantially accepted by the same Lacarbonara that it undertook, with the only 20/05/2002 prot note. No 4702, to pay the fee for occupation of public land;
g) the need to wait for the definition of opinion No appeal of the building permit 28/97 (which gave rise to the whole building) of a proposal by the owners of property bordering on the TAR Puglia, Lecce, defined at first instance by the court ruling 02/26/2003 No 507 of the First Chamber of the TAR Puglia, Sec. Lecce and pending in the State Council;
h) the need to replace, for reasons of incompatibility (as a designer, in the first phase of the building in question), the Technical Manager of the City of Leporano with the only employee on duty at the Office, provided the required qualifications (note 18/02/2004 prot. No 2276 of the Mayor of Leporano)
i) the definition of proceedings, on 04/05/2004, with the release of the building permit application required by 27/12/2001; permission to build that drew specifically, among its requirements, the aforementioned note 04/18/2003 prot. No 5427 of the Superintendence for Architectural Heritage and the Landscape of Puglia and the ruling of the First Chamber of the TAR, given on the appeal submitted by the owners of the property borders. The Tar
added that the claimant would still be rejected for a number of issues relating to proof of damages. The appellant Vito
Lacarbonara challenged these rulings, arguing that the evidence retrieved from the Tar are not such as to exclude the fault of the administration and in any case do not justify the delay in issuing the permit to build in variation after the period February to May 2002, when the investigation was now complete.
According to the appellant, also in relation to injury and causal link with the conduct of the administration omission would be provided with sufficient evidence, constituting at least a prima facie evidence.
It is noted that in the first place must be addressed the issue of delays caused by the municipal administration and guilt, which - according to the applicant - to characterize the delay.
The Court of First Instance confirmed the existence of a delay in issuing the permit to build in variant calling - in order to exclude the subjective element of the offense - a number of factors, some of which relate to the incompleteness of the documentation for investigating failures occurred due to the applicant.
It is noted that in the application for permit to build in variation was made on 27 December 2001 and 75 days for the definition of that, attracted by the Tar, expired in March 2002. The same
Tar acknowledges that drawings and opinion of the Superintendent were acquired on February 22, 2002 and that the request of the documents annexed to the opinion of the Superintendent has been found by the person on April 8, 2002. This
On that date means that the investigation was complete and that certainly at that point in charge of the proceedings would have to submit its proposal within ten days pursuant to art. 4, paragraph 2, of DL 398/1993, conv. ln in 493/1993 and within the next two weeks the qualifying title have been issued pursuant to paragraph 4 of Article. 4 (terms substantially corresponding to those of art. 20 of Presidential Decree No 380/2001, which entered into force definitively on 30 June 2003).
Permission to build variant was, therefore, be issued by May 3, 2002, and was only released on May 4, 2004 with two years of delay. The evidence relied
by Tar are not eligible to exclude the blame for the delay in providing the administration.
are not capable of justifying the delay requirements of inquiry sent by the city to the Superintendency: the latter had expressed a favorable opinion dated February 18, 2002 and the documents produced by the applicant in April 2002 excluded any doubt about the project in relation to which The opinion was expressed.
not return to that point between the powers of the City reviewing the opinion and requests sent to the Department appear in reality intended to challenge the legality of a profile of the opinion (contrary to the constraint), for which the City has no jurisdiction, and not the contradiction with other acts of the Superintendent, who was absent, as subsequently clarified by the latter.
In any event, any doubt on the opinion issued by the Superintendent could not justify the stagnation of the process, or a series of multiple requests, which were found to be dilatory, but at most would have led to a rapid and direct verification at the same Superintendent, in without which the process could only be brought to a conclusion on the basis of documents, among which there was a favorable opinion of the Superintendent.
Even more obvious is the inability of the other circumstances relied on by the tar in order to justify the delay:
- the request for legal advice the lawyer. Ruffo appare un espediente per non assumere la determinazione finale di un procedimento la cui istruttoria era ormai completa, come dimostra il fatto che alla tardiva comunicazione da parte del legale di ragioni di incompatibilità non è seguito il conferimento ad altro legale dell’incarico di redigere un parere, in realtà non utile ai fini della decisione;
- la necessità del pagamento dell’occupazione del suolo pubblico avrebbe dovuto costituire un mero adempimento preliminare al rilascio del titolo abilitativo, dopo l’accoglimento dell’istanza e non poteva certo condizionare il proseguimento del procedimento (peraltro, l’impegno a pagare la tassa è stato assunto nel maggio 2002, a conferma dell’insussistenza grounds for justification of the delay after that date);
- the existence of an opinion concerning the legality of the original building permit could not thwart the administrative action, unless the acts had not been suspended or annulled by the courts ( What is not occurring) or canceled in self-defense by the administration (in essence, in the presence of a dispute, the administration may consider the disputes that are moved in view of the exercise of its powers of self-defense, but can not decide simply take no action in an administrative proceeding, with its specific terms);
- totally specious - in order to reasons for the delay - turns out to be a need to replace the head of the proceeding as inconsistent, since the issues within the organizational arrangements of the AR and that in any way may affect the fulfillment of the terms of the procedure, as a guarantee of the private and the certainty timing of the administration, since the task of devising measures pa organizational measures to ensure compliance of terms provided by law. (Although it is not clear how the replacement of the controller process can justify such a delay).
from those findings as the delay in issuing the permit to build in variation is attributable to the municipality of subjectively Leporano e come non sussista alcun valido elemento idoneo a escludere la colpa dell’amministrazione per il ritardo.
Anzi dagli atti risulta il rilascio del permesso di costruire in variante sia intervenuto solo dopo la presentazione da parte del ricorrente di un ricorso avverso il silenzio ai sensi dell’allora vigente art. 21-bis della L. Tar e ciò conferma come alcun elemento ostativo sussisteva per il rilascio del provvedimento, avvenuto solo dopo la presentazione del ricorso e con due anni di ritardo (anche seguendo le tesi del Comune, qui comunque non accolte, il ritardo di un anno sarebbe imputabile alla sola esigenza di procedere alla nomina del responsabile del procedimento e tale elemento è indicativo della colpevole inerzia tenuta dal comune in questa vicenda).
3. L’accertamento della sussistenza di un ritardo di due anni nel rilascio del permesso di costruire in variante e l’imputabilità del ritardo al Comune non risolvono tutte le problematiche della presente controversia, che attiene al risarcimento del danno subito dal ricorrente a causa di tale ritardo.
Nel caso di specie, ricorre l’ipotesi in cui il privato invoca la tutela risarcitoria per i danni conseguenti al ritardo con cui l'amministrazione ha adottato un provvedimento a lui favorevole, ma emanato appunto con ritardo rispetto al termine previsto per quel determinato procedimento.
Il ritardo procedimentale ha, quindi, determinato un ritardo nell’attribuzione del c.d. "bene della vita", costituito in this case the possibility of building according to the project requested variant.
In these cases the Court is peaceful in accepting compensation for the damage caused by delay (provided of course that the damage there and it is proven) el'intervenuto art. 2-bis, paragraph 1, of Law 241/90, introduced by Law No 69/2009, confirms and strengthens the protection of private damages against the delays of the PA, stating that the government and equivalent entities are required to claim for damages caused as a consequence of intentional or negligent of the deadline for conclusion of the proceedings.
The rule requires that the time is good for life the citizen and the courts have recognized that the delay in the conclusion of any proceedings, it is always a cost, since the time factor is an essential variable in the preparation and implementation of financial plans relating to any intervention, influencing its convenience economic (cons. Right. Adm. Reg. Sic., November 4, 2010 1368, which, drawing from the arguments cited art. 2-bis, added that the damage is still available even if the authorization process had not yet concluded, even if the outcome had been negative in case).
In this case, it is irrelevant to the question of the Recoverability of damage caused by delay if not attributable to the so-called "good life" and compatibility with the principles established by the plenary session Decision No 7 / 2005 with the new art. 2-bis of Law 241/90, since the administration itself acknowledged that attributable to the (late) permit to build in variant
We must therefore move on to the evidence of the existence of damage and causation to the aforementioned delay. For each hypothesis
pa responsibility for damage caused by the unlawful exercise (or, as in this case, non-exercise) of administration, rests on the applicant in a rigorous proof of the damage, no being able to invoke the so-called principle acquisitive because this principle relates to the conduct of the investigation and the Annex of the facts, even if you may allow the use of rebuttable presumptions art. 2729 cc to prove the damage and its size, it is the inescapable obligation to submit the facts of the subject and when the burden of pleading and proof of the facts there can not be given entry to fulfill equitable assessment of the damage art. 1226 cc, because this rule presupposes the impossibility of proving the precise amount of the injury, nor can it be relied on one expert witness, intended to compensate for the failure to meet the burden of proof by the privato (Cons. Stato,. V, 13 giugno 2008 n. 2967; VI, 12 marzo 2004, n. 1261, secondo cui la consulenza tecnica, pur disposta d'ufficio, non è certo destinata ad esonerare la parte dalla prova dei fatti dalla stessa dedotti e posti a base delle proprie richieste, fatti che devono essere dimostrati dalla medesima parte alla stregua dei criteri di ripartizione dell'onere della prova posti dall'art. 2697 c.c., ma ha la funzione di fornire all'attività valutativa del giudice l'apporto di cognizioni tecniche non possedute).
La stessa richiamata giurisprudenza ha anche precisato che l'onere probatorio può ritenersi assolto allorché il ricorrente indichi, a fronte di un danno certo nella sua verificazione, taluni criteri di quantificazione thereof, unless the court's power to examine the shareability through the contribution of the consultant or engineer, however, when the applicant furnishes proof of the existence and amount of damages.
The Court of First Instance misapplied those principles, considering all the damage is not shown for the delay in awarding the final contracts to acquire the buildings to be built, already the subject of the preliminary agreement and the biological damage suffered as a result of pathologies arising as a result of conduct by omission of the administration.
It is noted that in fact the applicant had lodged in the first instance a series of direct evidence to demonstrate that they damage and causation (report on the overall value of the property, financial statements showing losses and expertise to the part about the biological damage suffered as a result of the prolonged delay of the administration).
The burden of proof was therefore at least partly fulfilled by the applicant, who had provided evidence to demonstrate the delay is attributable to a series of financial losses incurred, and to a medical condition found
This section has therefore set up two expert witnesses to verify the correctness of the applicant's argument, asking, for the profile inherent in the delay in signing contracts, a number of factors capable of identifying criteria di quantificazione diversi da quelli prospettati dalla parte e ciò ha giustificato l’acquisizione in appello di documenti ulteriori, ritenuti indispensabili ai fini della decisione ai sensi dell’art. 104, comma 2, cod. proc. amm. (e, in precedenza, dell’art. 345, comma 3, c.p.c.), tenuto anche conto che tali profili non erano stati approfonditi in primo grado, essendosi il Tar limitato ad escludere la sussistenza dell’elemento soggettivo dell’illecito.
4. Si deve, quindi, passare ad esaminare i due distinti profili della richiesta di risarcimento del danno, partendo da quello inerente il ritardo nella stipula dei contratti di compravendita delle unità immobiliari, oggetto del permesso di costruire in variante in questione.
Sgombrato in precedenza il campo da ogni eccezione relativa alla inammissibilità delle produzioni documentali, avvenute in appello ed esaminate dal Ctu, si rileva come il consulente d’ufficio, dott. Donato Pezzuto, abbia risposto in modo esaustivo ai quesiti formulati, fornendo al Collegio ogni elemento per decidere, anche in relazione alle osservazioni formulate dai consulenti di parte.
In particolare, con riferimento all’incidenza del ritardo nel rilascio del permesso di costruire sul prezzo di compravendita, risultante dai contratti definitivi, il Ctu ha evidenziato che non sono documentate le ragioni per cui le parti abbiano stipulato i contratti definitivi ad un prezzo inferiore a quello indicato sui preliminari di vendita, adding that the possibility of damage on these price differences is based solely on the statements and that part of the preliminary contracts are not registered with the Inland Revenue and they have no firm date.
The consultant was right to put the assessment of such items to the State Council, while quantifying the price differences between preliminary and final contracts in euro 332,904.90.
The Board believes that has not been reached adequate proof of date of signing of the preliminaries and, above all, the causal link between the delay in issuing the permit to construct and different price quoted in the final acts of sale.
Any suitable element was provided by applicant to show that these differences represent a discount applied as a result of the delay in signing the final contracts and must, therefore, ruled out the existence of the mentioned causality.
The CTU has also stated that, although not shown in most of the contracts a preliminary date for the signing of definitive, it is reasonable to assume that if the variation had been granted permission in a timely manner, the final contracts could be awarded to Since the end of May 2002.
That finding, the Board agrees, takes a view that there is a causal link between the delay of the City and the damage caused by failure Immediate availability the amounts corresponding to the purchase price of the property for the applicant.
In order to quantify the damage, the consultant has proposed two alternative criteria, one is the interest actually charged by the bank to the claimant and the second based on the statutory interest. The Board considers
not likely that no small amount of money could be left by the applicant on his bank account, which by then had very low interest (below 0.1%) and judges, therefore, proper use of the criterion of legal interest, in which period ranging between 2.5 and 3% (corresponding to different extent other forms of investment, easily accessible).
This policy has been correctly applied by the consultant in relation to the date of each exchange transaction, just as properly excluding those operations for which was concluded after a preliminary permit to build in variation.
The total amount of statutory interest, calculated by the consultant, is the sum of € 36,100.33 and must therefore be granted to the applicant under dir damages, together with the further sum of € 2042.48, corresponding to the interests and expenses for financing by the applicant contract with a bank in June 2002, which would not have been contracted or would have been immediately terminated in case of absence of the delay and consequent early availability of funds stemming from the sale of the properties.
E 'also proved a causal link between the late issuance of building permits and the subsequent signing of final contracts and ICE, the applicant continued to pay for the period May 2002 to May 2004 amounted to euro 2117 , 36 (who would not pay if the contracts are concluded before the final).
With reference to the legal costs claimed by the applicant, it is noted that expenses related to judgments against the town of Leporano counterparties or against others over the issue of the building permit can not be recognized in this office for compensation, ma formeranno oggetto delle statuizione dei competenti giudici in sede di definizione di ciascuna controversia (compresa ovviamente la presente, come verrà statuito in seguito).
Vanno, invece, riconosciute a titolo di risarcimento del danno le spese sostenute nella causa promossa dal signor Valentini contro il ricorrente proprio per il ritardo nella stipula del contratto definitivo e per una riduzione del prezzo; tali spese ammontano a euro 3.864,86.
In relazione a tale controversia non può essere riconosciuta alcuna ulteriore somma a titolo di risarcimento del danno, non essendovi allo stato un danno certo e dipendendo l’attualità della questione dall’esito di quel giudizio civile, trattandosi, allo stato, di un danno puramente hypothetical and not supported by any evidence - as correctly stated by Tar - the reasonable likelihood of verification.
Nor, finally, may be recognized amounts related to operating losses incurred by the firm of appellant during the period in question, since such a requirement, proposed by the applicant at first instance, appears to be uncertain and difficult to apply in the results and, above all, alternative to the analytical assessment of the damage made previously.
The total damage suffered by the claimant for the consequences of the delay in issuing the permit to build on the sale of the properties amounts to a total of € 44,125.03.
on revenue from the levy di risarcimento del danno, costituente debito di valore, spettano la rivalutazione monetaria secondo gli indici Istat dal maggio 2004 ad oggi e gli interessi compensativi calcolati nella misura legale separatamente sul capitale via via rivalutato dalle singole scadenze mensili fino al soddisfo (Cass. civ., III, n. 5671/2010; Cons. Stato, IV, n. 2983/06). La decorrenza di interessi e rivalutazione dal maggio del 2004 si giustifica con il fatto che in tale data è cessata la situazione di illecito dell’amministrazione e i criteri utilizzati dal Ctu hanno in concreto riportato a tale data la quantificazione del danno.
5. Con riguardo all’ulteriore profilo di danno chiesto da ricorrente e relativo alla patologia medica, si ricorda che il giudice of First Instance had ruled out the Recoverability for lack of evidence concerning the causal link between the conduct of the Administration and the nurse.
E 'has already been shown that in first instance the applicant had provided evidence of injury and causation, finding that there is an opinion in medico-legal part, based on issues that were investigated in the expert witness, prepared to appeal. Dr.
CTU. Mario Borrelli, MD State Police, revealed the existence of the disease "anxiety disorder - depression reactive with somatic somatization, such as alopecia," finding the onset of this illness can be placed between late 2001 and early 2002.
In relation to causation, the consultant found that the disorder found in the applicant's case is the "external stimuli can influence negatively the ability to adapt to a subject" and that "the conduct of omission on the part of City was experienced by the appellant as an act deeply unjust and inexplicable, which has failed to offer adequate responses on the existential drawing.
The assessment of the existence of a causal link between the disease and the delay in issuing the permit to build, although partly based on probabilistic assessment is shared by the College.
Va, tuttavia, evidenziato che la quantificazione del danno biologico permanente nella misura di 10 punti percentuali non tiene conto del fatto che lo stesso Ctu ha ricondotto l’insorgenza dei primi avvisi della patologia ad un periodo (fine 2001 – inizio 2002), antecedente al manifestarsi dell’inerzia della p.a., anche se il Ctu ha poi rilevato che "la strutturazione di una vera patologia psichica è poi insorta nel maggio del 2004, … allorché iniziò i trattamenti in ambito dermatologico, peraltro infruttuosi, seguiti dal ricovero in casa di cura psichiatrica (luglio 2004)".
Il nesso di causalità può ritenersi sussistente in relazione a tale seconda fase della patologia, e non alla sua insorgenza and, consequently, the biological damage can be permanent equitably reduced to 7 percentage points.
should be noted that the biological damage is that aspect of non-pecuniary damage which pertains to the physical integrity of the person (Cass. civ., III, No. 19816/2010), assuming the consequences of an invalid personal nature only in capital cases test, in this case, not exist, eligibility to affect the ability of the injured to produce income (Cass. civ., III, No. 13431/2010). Following
notes rulings of the United Sections of the Supreme Court (No. 26972, 26973, 26974 and 26975 of 11 November 2008), the scope of the Recoverability of non-pecuniary damage is extended beyond the cases expressly provided by law (art. 185 cp), to cases where the breach has been injured in a serious way a person's right protected by the Constitution, such as damage from attacks upon the inviolable right to health (art. 32 of the Constitution) called biological damage, which is given by the Articles. 138 and 139, Legislative Decree no. 209/2005, specific legal definition.
In this case, the damage found by the CTU is precisely the biological damage resulting from impairment of the inviolable right to health and derives also from an offense of a continuing nature, consisting of inertia pa in providing a private instance , which is of particular negative value, resulting dall'ingiustificata exceeding the period of completion of the proceedings, that the legislature has recently raised the scope of the basic level of services to be ensured throughout the national territory, pursuant to art. 117, paragraph 2, lett. m) of the Constitution (see paragraph 2-bis., art. 29 of Law No 241/90, introduced by Law No. 69/2009, which recalls between such essential requirement for the pa to conclude the proceedings before the deadline and the provisions concerning the maximum duration of proceedings).
This reminder, though made for the purposes of defining the scope of Law No 241/90 with regard to the relationship between state and regional legislator, is a fundamental well as to enhance and strengthen all forms of protection, including compensation for damage occasioned by delay of the PA, which can then also consider the consequences of that delay physical integrity of the citizen.
In this case, the already weak physical and mental situation of the applicant has been in practice sorely tried by an expectation, sometimes seemed endless, the conclusion of a proceeding, which determined the fate of the only business activity in that are doing. The two-year delay in the conclusion of the proceedings and the already mentioned and repeated spurious claims, which have assumed the sole purpose of delaying (unlawfully) the adoption of the measure finale, sono elementi che hanno finito per incidere sull’equilibrio psico – fisico del ricorrente, provocando un danno, che va quindi risarcito.
La quantificazione del danno biologico permanente, determinato in sette punti percentuali, va effettuata in via equitativa, anche tenendo conto dell’età del ricorrente nel 2004 (41 anni) e dei criteri di cui all’art. 139 del d. lgs. n. 209/2005 (corretti in aumento – sempre in via equitativa – anche alla luce dei criteri utilizzati dalla giurisprudenza civile e in particolare dal Tribunale di Milano; v. Trib. Milano, V, 09 giugno 2009, n. 7515), nella misura di complessivi euro 11.220,00, su cui vanno calcolati interessi e rivalutazione monetaria secondo the criteria mentioned above.
6. In conclusion, the appeal must be upheld in part and, by way of the contested decision, it should be part of First Instance upheld the appeal with costs and the common duty to pay damages in the total sum of € 55,345.03. Well a currency revaluation according to the Istat indices from May 2004 to present and compensatory interest calculated to the extent legally separate capital gradually re-evaluated by each month until I meet deadlines.
the unsuccessful City Council following charges of two levels of jurisdiction, dismissed the extent indicated in the device.
Paid by the City must be ordered also the fees of the two CTU, which is believed to be liquidated collegialmente in questa sede, non essendo intervenuto al momento del passaggio in decisione del ricorso alcun decreto di liquidazione ai sensi degli artt. 66, comma 4 e 67, comma 5, cod. proc. amm..
Al consulente dott. Renato Pezzuto va liquidato il compenso di complessivi euro 6.500,00, oltre accessori di legge, tenuto conto del valore della controversia, riferito al complesso delle voci di risarcimento esaminate (euro 391.320,02) e dei criteri fissati dall’art. 2 del d.m. 30 maggio 2002.
Al consulente dott. Mario Borrelli va liquidato il compenso di complessivi euro 2.592,70, di cui euro 1092,70 per spese, oltre agli accessori di legge.
In caso di già avvenuta corresponsione ai consulenti dell’acconto da parte dell’appellante, its sum will be deducted from the CTU to be paid to the Appellant and reimbursed by the municipality.
PQM
The Council of State in the courts (Section Five), is partly an appeal mentioned in the headnote and the effect, the reform of the decision under appeal is partly in the first appeal position, condemning the town of Leporano to pay to Vito Lacarbonara, by way of damages, the total amount of € 55,345.03, and currency appreciation over statutory interest under the criteria set out in the recitals.
condemns the town of Leporano recast in favor of the appellant, the costs of double levels of jurisdiction, paid in total amount of Euro 10,000.00, plus VAT and CP. Liquid
in favor of Dr. CTU. Renato Pezzuto the total compensation of € 6500.00, as well as accessories and in favor of Dr. CTU. Mario Borrelli compensation for a total of € 2,592.70, of which € 1092.70 expenses, as well as accessories, with costs borne by the joint CTU appealed. Sort
that this sentence is carried out by the administrative authority.
Decided in Rome in the chambers on day 3 December 2010 with the intervention of the judiciary:
Stefano Baccarini, President
Carlo Saltelli, Councillor Robert
Chieppa, Advisor, extenders
Angelica Dell'Utri, Councillor
Antonio Amicuzzi, Councillor
FILED IN OFFICE 02/28/2011 The
