Petlist 토렌트

HAPPY 2010 WITH BEST WISHES FROM TERREDUCALI


The success of Terre Ducali is due to a tight-knit staff that works with commitment and professionalism .
We wish everyone a happy new year customers with quality products Terre Ducali.

How To Get Myspeed Enounce Free

TERREDUCALI

Graduation Dresses For Female

The Italians are rediscovering the rites in Latin. And a book reveals all the ancient liturgy by

Back to the desire of faith and prayer. Three young men, with a common passion for the ancient liturgy, wrote a book on the pre-reform post-conciliar rites "Introibo to the altar" (published by Faith & Culture). A topical issue again after the recent Doxa survey which revealed that the majority of Italians would return to the Latin mass. Daniel Sorce, one of three authors, Affaritaliani chooses to tell how the idea of \u200b\u200bthe volume. "We wanted to fill a void because there was a recent book on the liturgy in use before the post-conciliar reform." He adds: "The result of the survey is a positive sign: it means that there is a need to rediscover the sacred."

Stefania La Malfa

It is titled "Introibo to the altar" (published by Faith & Culture) and is an introductory volume on the liturgy before the reform post reconcile. I have written three young men, two students and a seminarian: Elvis Cuneo, Daniel and Raymond Sorce Mameli. They share a diploma at the conservatory and university studies and theology. And the common passion for the ancient liturgy that led them to write a summary of the liturgical year. A topical theme back after Doxa recent survey that revealed how the majority of Italians want to hear Mass in Latin. The recent admission of traditionalist Anglicans into the Catholic Church, with a ritual similar to our old missal, brings news of the Latin liturgy governed by the Motu Proprio "Summorum Pontificum" of Pope Benedict XVI. In some families several towns of the Marches are collecting signatures to ask their parish priests celebrating the old rite. The book will be presented by His Eminence Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, Prefect Emeritus of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei Saturday, October 24th at 16:30 at Palace bird - Belvedere Ostrenze Amurri (An). Daniel Sorce, one of three authors of the book, told Affaritaliani like the idea of \u200b\u200bthe volume.

What "Introibo to the altar?

"Our book can be described as an introduction, a summary for those who do not start and is an expert who wants to play the liturgical service. Si tratta di un libro divulgativo indirizzato soprattutto ai laici che vogliono per esempio servire all'altare. E' sempre esistita la possibilità di celebrare la messa attuale in latino anche se questo avviene raramente, come per esempio per le messe celebrate dal Papa".

Come è nata l'idea di scrivere questo volume?

"Abbiamo sentito l'esigenza di colmare un vuoto perché mancava una pubblicazione recente sulla liturgia in uso prima della riforma post conciliare su come si organizza e si serve una funzione. I testi degli anni '50 e '60 che si occupavano dell'argomento si rigolgevano a un pubblicao che aveva ben presente di cosa si parlava, oggi invece c'è bisogno di fornire basic information for understanding the differenzze between the old and new. We are not experts but we have a personal passion that we have cultivated over the years: I am a college student and I'm 24 and the two other authors 25 and 30 years and are ubno student and a seminarian.

What The old rite differs from the current one?

"In the ancient rite of the priest's position was denoted in the same direction of the Assembly and the common orientation of the celebrant and the people to God: This was perceived as both were facing in in the same direction and this is certainly showed a sense of sacredness. In addition the use of a language not vulgar, that is Latin, gave him the knowledge that in all the Catholic churches of the world were praying in the same language, in addition to the feeling that when you put in the presence of God requires respect for the use of a language from a conscrata ecclesiastical tradition. Finally, the long moments of silence in which the priest prayed softly leave room for individual prayer, important point of every liturgical celebration, which today has gone a bit 'lost'.

What is the result of a recent survey Doxa?

"The survey will derive two significant information. On the one hand, a few Catholics know that there is a different from modern and ancient rite this is also due to an attitude of lack of information from the clergy. But on the other a very large number of practicing Catholics said that it would be in favor of a coexistence of the two forms of the rite in their own parish or participate personally on a monthly basis. So it means that the interest in the traditional liturgy is widespread among the faithful: it is a need for a rediscovery of the sacred, including those who do not know him directly. It 'a very positive sign ".

The present liturgy the faithful away then?

" After the post-conciliar reform there was a decline in attendance at Mass, a sign that the new liturgy has sent away the faithful: it is a significant decline was also cauasto the criteria by which the change was made. Even the then Cardinal Ratzinger has accused some results of the liturgy as its trivialization, of the decline to a party, a celebration of the community unable to arouse a sense of sacredness and prayer. "

Source: Affaritaliani.it

How Does Metformin Aid In Pregancy

Review of "The Weekly of Padre Pio"

Undoubtedly, the recent restoration of the traditional rite of Mass, approved and encouraged by Benedict XVI in 2007, is helping the world and throughout the Church a silent and widespread spiritual revival, una ripresa della devozione e della pietà eucaristica soprattutto nelle giovani generazioni sia di laici cattolici, che di seminaristi e sacerdoti.
Ma il legame tra culto e cultura è a tutti noto e non esiste infatti, contro l’idea tutta moderna circa la presunta ragionevolezza dell’ateismo, un popolo o una nazione, in Occidente come in Oriente, che non abbia nella sua storia e nella sua arte, nella sua cultura e nei suoi costumi, un’impronta religiosa, sacrale, impregnata di trascendenza.
Il rito tradizionale della Santa Messa, oltre ad una nuova efficacissima barriera al processo contemporaneo di secolarizzazione, costituisce di per sé un valido tramite tra l’uomo di oggi e la nostra lunga storia di italiani, un popolo la cui identità è davvero incomprensibile senza far riferimento a quell’avvenimento cristiano, qui da noi giunto grazie a quegli stessi uomini che personalmente conobbero il Redentore, come i santi martiri Pietro e Paolo.
Il libro in questione (E. Cuneo, D. Di Sorco, R. Mameli, Introibo ad altare Dei , edizioni Fede & Cultura, 2008, euro 25) riassume perfettamente quanto sopra detto. Gli autori hanno tra i 24 e i 32 anni e sono tutti e tre musicisti, specializzati nel canto lirico e gregoriano, nella liturgia o nell’uso di strumenti da concerto. La loro pregevole opera, che si avvale di una prefazione del card. Castillòn Hoyos e di una postfazione di padre Konrad zu Löwenstein, si presenta come un manuale per l’apprendimento del servizio liturgico dell’Altare, ed è dedicato dunque in special modo ai chierichetti e ai ministranti; il suo contenuto però è ben più ampio.
Infatti parlando della sacra Liturgia (cap. 1), dei Libri liturgici (cap.2), dei ministri del culto (cap. 3) o del canto e della musica sacra (cap.6), si viene immersi nella nostra più vera e profonda dimensione culturale e storica: ogni uomo di cultura e ogni fedele cattolico dovrebbero accostarsi a queste dense pagine, scritte con grande semplicità e slancio giovanile, per trarne quei punti di riferimento culturali, estetici e spirituali che permettono da un lato di uscire dalla banale volgarità del quotidiano, and secondly to understand, and above the merely folkloric or literary value and meaning of many traditions, (processions, pilgrimages, festivities and secular purposes) that are still preserved, despite everything, in our old Europe. Our varied and impressive musical heritage, arts and architecture (think of the many churches and cathedrals) of which we are rightly proud to be Italian, if you explain in general with great piety of our people, must also own a lot to the liturgical form codified by Pope St. Pius V in the sixteenth century, which actually dates from the early beginnings of the Christian era.
Everyone recognizes that modern man suffers from a process of rootlessness, cultural alienation, especially in the metropolis, and a terrifying identity crisis. We strongly believe that the best way to deal with these diseases typical of the era of globalization, it is, rather than in psychological techniques or methods "spiritual" borrowed from other civilizations, in the escape the pace and suffocating mentality of the secular city, knocking down the false idols of consumerism, career and self-destructive cult.
in this direction the highest worship of God, that is sober and ascetic, sacred liturgy and hierarchy of the Roman millennium, as accurately described by our young authors, is the best antidote to the loss of existential meaning and the loss, and also, above all the time and place from which to start to recreate in us and around us, the values \u200b\u200band customs of the eternal and indestructible Christian civilization.

Fabrizio Cannon

Daddies And Darling Galleries

Presentation of the book "Introibo altar to the Gods" in the Marche

Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 16:30

in the conference room of the Palazzo Uccellini Amurri
Corso Garibaldi, 6 - Belvedere Ostrense

Presentation of the book "Introibo TO THE ALTAR"
Elvis Cuneo, Daniel Sorce, Raymond Mameli
(Edizioni Faith & Culture)

the presence of

His Eminence Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos

Posts:

Riccardo Piccioni, Mayor of Belvedere Ostrense
Carradori Andrea, Luciana Musician
Salvucci, Headmaster - Educator
Daniel Sorce, Author

Conclusion:

Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos
President of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei"

Seguirà buffet

Per informazioni contattare:

Segreteria telefonica e fax: 0733-960561; sms: 338-1075014; e-mail: info@associazioneleopardi.it

Why Does My Bf Likes To Suck My Nipples?

Council of State, Sec. IV, 12 March 2009, No 1458

REPUBBLICAITALIANA
IN THE NAME OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE

The Council of State in the courts (Section Four) gives the following

DECISION

rgn8326/2008 The action brought on appeal by Anas spa, in the person of lrpt, represented and defended by the Attorney General State, whose offices at home in Rome on the street of the Portuguese n.12,
against
Giuseppe Sammarco Construction Ltd., in the person of lrpt, represented by defense attorneys Alfredo Verbaro Gualtieri and Demetrius, with an address in Rome at Via Ovid No 10 Bei Anna Rose at the office, and against

Emmedue Ltd in the person of lrpt not formed,

for the annulment of the decision n.1138

of 2008 the TAR Calabria-Catanzaro filed on July 29 2008 notified on August 1, 2008, by which it was granted the appeal brought by Sammons Ltd against the withdrawal of the award prot. n.3416-P of February 6, 2008, the resulting award successivamente disposta a favore della società Emmedue srl, ove occorra del bando di gara, nonché per la dichiarazione di nullità, annullamento, inefficacia o disapplicazione dell’eventuale contratto nel frattempo stipulato.
Visto il ricorso con i relativi allegati;
Visto l’atto di costituzione in giudizio di Sammarco srl;
Viste le memorie prodotte dalle parti a sostegno delle rispettive difese;
Visto il dispositivo di sentenza n. 78 dell’11/2/09;
Relatore alla udienza pubblica del 10 febbraio 2009 il Consigliere Sergio De Felice;
Uditi l’avv. Verbaro e l’avv. dello Stato Stigliano;
Ritenuto in fatto e considerato in diritto quanto segue;

FACT

an action brought before the Regional Administrative Court of the Calabrian society Sammarco Ltd. acted against the withdrawal of the award of which had been addressed in the race to work on the so-called state of Serre by winning the criterion of the lowest in the basis of race pursuant to Article 82 Public Contracts Code. Having
Anas SpA provides control of the requirements stated in the competition especially with regard to regular contributions, the company said it would not have resulted in good standing as of December 17, 2007.
The withdrawal was justified on the grounds that in its audit by 17 December 2007, the company would not rule con il versamento dei contributi INPS-INAIL- Cassa edile, come da nota del 22 gennaio 2008, mentre alla data della domanda di partecipazione del 10 dicembre 2007 aveva dichiarato la propria regolarità contributiva, sulla scorta del DURC rilasciato alla stessa società in data 20 novembre 2007, che scadeva, sulla base della circolare del Ministero Lavoro e Previdenza sociale 30.1.2008, n.5, in data 20 dicembre 2007, mentre il periodo di gara terminava in data 18 dicembre 2007.
Nei fatti pertanto la domanda di partecipazione era del 10 dicembre 2007, la concorrente dichiarava di essere in regola con le dovute contribuzioni (INPS- INAIL- Cassa edile) e produceva DURC rilasciato in data 20 novembre 2007 che, in base all’art. 7 DM 24 ottobre 2007, covering a period of validity until 20 December 2007, covered the period of tender which closed on December 18, 2007.
the negative outcome of the next test, on 16 January, warned of the initiation of revocation of the final award; Anas was based on a new DURC of January 10, 2008, which showed that the company concerned was not regular payment date of December 17, 2007.
Company on January 30, 2008 was sent Anas with a note which stated that it was complying with the duties of insurance, but that certification bodies, except Inail, were unable to comment because of the regularity computer problems. On 11 febbraio 2008 la società faceva pervenire altra certificazione durc dalla quale risultava la regolarità contributiva alla data del 17 dicembre 2007. A questo punto l’Anas sospendeva la revoca e chiedeva ai tre enti previdenziali di confermare il contenuto della nota dell’11 febbraio 2008.
La Cassa edile con nota del 14 febbraio 2008 rispondeva che in relazione al durc emesso in data 11 febbraio 2008, alla dicitura “è in regola” dovesse sostituirsi quella “non è in regola con i versamenti alla data del 17 dicembre 2007”. L’INPS analogamente con nota del 20 febbraio 2008 rilevava che la società in questione in realtà aveva provveduto a regolarizzare la propria posizione contributiva solo in data 16 gennaio 2008 e quindi alla data del 17 dicembre 2007 non era da considerarsi in regola.
Il giudice di primo grado accoglieva il ricorso ritenendo che il “buco” di regolarità contributiva riguardasse pochi giorni; si faceva riferimento anche alla contraddittorietà degli enti certificatori, al fatto che si trattava di inadempimenti non gravi e che la regolarizzazione era avvenuta al più presto, alla mancanza della gravità richiesta dall’articolo 38 del codice contratti pubblici, alla possibilità della regolarizzazione successiva, consentita sia dal Consiglio di Stato che dal giudice comunitario; tutte tali circostanze, secondo il primo giudice, renderebbero non legittima la revoca della aggiudicazione definitiva.
Il giudice di primo grado riteneva inoltre applicabile ratione temporis il d.m. 24 ottobre 2007, che statuisce con norma di diritto positivo espressamente la possibilità di regolarizzazione entro un certo termine.
Avverso la suddetta sentenza propone appello l’Anas spa, appaltante, che deduce la ingiustizia della pronuncia, in sostanza richiamando l’articolo 38 codice contratti pubblici (sia pure evidenziando che esso si rivolgerebbe ai meri partecipanti e per i quali sarebbe prevista la esclusione in caso di commissione di violazioni gravi, definitivamente accertate, alle norme in materia di contributi previdenziali e assistenziali, secondo la legislazione italiana o dello Stato in cui sono stabiliti”) e l’articolo 2 D.L. 210/2002 (Referred to in that Article 38), which is aimed specifically to foster.
It is argued however that the company should be in foster compliance with its obligations to social security, while in the case was clearly the irregularities of the position with two out of three institutions.
Moreover, the same article 38 paragraph 3 concludes that "it remains stationary, the Trustee, the requirement for certification of regular contributions referred to in Article 2 of Decree-Law of 25 September 2002, n .210, converted into law November 22, 2002, and 266 of Article 3, paragraph 8, of Legislative Decree 14 August 1996, n.494, as amended and supplemented. " The appeal argues that the
Sammarco as attesting the Building Fund of Catanzaro, 14.2.2008 at the date of 17.12.2007 was not in compliance with its obligations and has regularized his position only on 18 January 2008; for INPS (certificates, 20.2.2008), the company "has taken steps to rectify the tax position on 16.1.2008, 17.12.2008 and then to not be considered in good standing."
Therefore, based on the lack of regular contributions dell'affidatario, the withdrawal of the award was a necessary act, regardless of any assessment of the seriousness of any breach or not.
The appellant also complained about the violation of the said dm October 24, 2007, published in OJ 30.11.2007 entered into force only on 12/30/2007 (for which the DURC would have a month's validity), since it is not in force at the time of the race.
It consists of asking the company Sammarco declare the inadmissibility of the appeal, because it did not criticize the real reason for revocation of any award consisting of the "untrue statement" because it was not in compliance with tax obligations.
Substance seeks the dismissal of the appeal as unfounded.
the chambers on November 18, 2008 this section, considering an initial summary of the reasons of appeal worthy exequatur di positiva valutazione, rinviava la causa ex articolo 23 bis l.1034 del 1971 alla udienza di discussione del 10 febbraio 2009.
Con memoria depositata in data 30 gennaio 2009 la impresa Sammarco ha eccepito la improcedibilità del ricorso, a causa del quasi esaurimento del rapporto perché i lavori sono stati eseguiti; ha eccepito anche la acquiescenza della amministrazione, che nel frattempo ha stipulato il contratto.
Alla udienza di discussione del 10 febbraio 2009 la causa è stata trattenuta in decisione.

DIRITTO

1.In via preliminare, il Collegio osserva che sono destituite di ogni fondamento e come tali da rigettare le eccezioni sollevate da parte appellata, relative alla improcedibilità and acquiescence.
It 'obvious that, for the principle of continuity of administrative action, the administration issued the policy that, in the course of proceedings, enforcement of judgments in the presence and absence of acceptance of judicial protection, has had its proper conduct .
This additional activity can not be inferred, however, do not acquiescent behavior of the administration, which has indeed grown up in the bottom of its protection, or a lack of interest occurred for admissibility, as if to give preference to the principle of so-called fact.
E 'known that the legality of the choice of the so-called "right contractor" can not keep its usefulness for legal administration also contract out because practically runs on its own legality, illegality, or conversely, can and must further sorting consequential effects on administrative activities, the activities of contract and equity point of view of those involved ( on the permanence of such interest to the case law is so extensive that it is not considered to have to mention).
2.All same way is no basis to the objection of inadmissibility of the appeal on the grounds that the appellant administration has pinned his complaints of irregularities only on the objective position to pay, nothing comments on the real reason for exclusion, which would in reality the mendacity and falsehood of the declaration of regular contributions.
The Board notes in this regard that is necessary but also sufficient to allow the admissibility of the appeal of the contracting administration the concentration of the grounds for appeal on the objective and overt position of irregularity to pay.
Considering that usually accompanies the position of irregularity and is connected, as in this case, such a statement, but false, statements of regularity, the reminder of the mendacity and falsehood is, according to the College, a further absorbent and good cause act negative withdrawal of the award. 3.In the
on the appeal is well founded.
The regular contributions and taxation of the parties to tender for the award of contracts with the PA must be present at the time of offer and must be ensured even in the moments following the presentation of supply and demand, and then of course until the award, being the obvious need for the contracting authority to verify the reliability of the participant in the race until the end of it (C. State, IV, May 31, 2007, n.2876).
The necessity of the regularity assumption is that the rules permit the administration to determine, in the presence of contradictory elements, the actual situation in order, among other things, the tax position of the individual participant company (C. State, IV, May 31, 2007, n.2876).
Following the entry into force of discipline on certificate of regular contributions, imposed by Articles 2, dl 25 September 2002, n.210, as amended by l.conv. 266 of 22 November 2002, paragraph 10 and 86 Leg. September 10, 2003, n.276, verification of the regularity of contributions of the companies participating in the tendering procedures for procurement with the public administration is left to the institutions security, whose certifications are necessary to contracting, which can not criticize il contenuto (Consiglio Stato, V, 23 gennaio 2008, n.147).
In materia di gare per l’aggiudicazione di lavori pubblici, dalla disciplina istitutiva del Durc (Documento unico di regolarità contributiva, rilasciato in base a convenzioni tra Inps e Inail ai sensi dell’articolo 2 comma 2 d.l. 25 settembre 2002 n.210), l’impresa che si rende aggiudicataria di un appalto deve non solo essere in regola con gli obblighi previdenziali ed assistenziali sulla stessa gravanti fin dal momento della presentazione della domanda, ma deve conservare la correttezza contributiva per tutto lo svolgimento del rapporto contrattuale.
Ne consegue che l’eventuale accertamento di una pendenza di carattere previdenziale o assistenziale in capo all’impresa pur dichiarata aggiudicataria dell’appalto prodottasi anche in epoca successiva alla scadenza del termine per partecipare al procedimento di scelta del contraente implica, a seconda dei casi, la impossibilità per l’amministrazione appaltante di stipulare il contratto con l’impresa medesima, ovvero la risoluzione dello stesso; sempre in forza di ciò, è del tutto irrilevante un eventuale adempimento tardivo della obbligazione contributiva quand’anche ricondotto retroattivamente, quanto ad efficacia, al momento della scadenza del termine di pagamento.
Si ritiene anche che – a causa della inderogabilità e imperatività della disciplina in questione - nel caso in cui un bando di gara di appalto public does not include a requirement for the company that is allotted to submit to the contracting certification on the regular contributions, the same invitation is meant by integrated prescription of the obligation under Article. 2 dl September 25, 2002, n.210.
Article 1, paragraph 1 dl September 25, 2002 n.210 (converted with amendments by l.22 266 of November 2002), determined that the undertakings entrusted with a public contract are required to submit to the contracting certification on regular contributions on pain of revocation of custody.
A clear logic of economics leads to legal means to interpret that provision to the effect of making necessary the exclusion from the race many times, as in this case, the situation of irregularity is overt, like the administrative documents held by the contracting authority, in a stage prior to the intervention of the award, and so in order to avoid illogical award a race destined to be the subject of mandatory self-defense and later as did the legislation mentioned here (Council of State, VI, October 29, 2004, n.7045). The regularity is determined by
has belonged to a mere participant (which may be in custody cases) and in this sense can not mend a variety of rigid discipline among the participants and caregivers. The defense firm
Recalls that Article 38 paragraph 1 letter i) requires the existence of "serious violations" and the mere mention DURC in the absence of regular contributions may not in itself lead to the exclusion of the company found not in compliance because the document in question does not specify anything about the finality of the investigation (in this respect the opinion of the Supervisory Authority for Public Contracts of Works, Services and Supplies n.102 8 November 2007, which essentially defers the decision of the contracting authority).
In the opposite direction compared to the defensive positions of the company Sammarco should be noted that in this case the investor, then foster, as evidenced by related claims, as of December 17, 2007, coinciding with the award has been made, or was not in compliance with the building or with the Social Security Fund.
It is therefore a serious irregularities and already subsisting at the time of the award stage. There is also
dispute or refutation of these claims and DURC takes the value of a statement of science, to be placed between the documents for certification or written statement by a public official and being purely declarative data available to the public administration assisted by public trust under Article 2700 Civil Code, thus making the test to be false.
Given the legal nature of the DURC, non residua in capo alla stazione appaltante alcun margine di valutazione o di apprezzamento in ordine ai dati ed alle circostanze in esso contenute.
Non risulta che per la situazione di attestata irregolarità sia stato attivato alcun tipo di tutela al fine di contestare l’accertamento (tutela che, se azionata in modo non temerario, avrebbe reso non definitivamente accertato il grave inadempimento).
Nella specie si è verificata in primo luogo una ipotesi di falsità della dichiarazione in merito alla posizione di regolarità contributiva; in secondo luogo, e in ogni caso, la posizione di irregolarità contributiva deve ritenersi acclarata, non contestata, non regolarizzabile a posteriori, non contestata in fatto, da assessed certainly no small terms, covering that period, two out of three institutions.
4.Non is also useful to allow room for tolerance in favor of the company Sammarco call made by the first judge to the ministerial decree published in the Official Gazette of November 30, 2007, entered into force only on December 30, 2007 (bill which would allow a call from the institutions to stabilize the failure to pay within a tolerance of fifteen days).
As also observed by the first court, called the decree is effective only from 30 December 2007, the award took place on December 17, 2007 and the race at that time shall be considered conclusive, nor the proceedings can still be considered pending, for the next innovative application of rules, only because the procedure already stated in substance is followed and any subsequent testing.
On the issue of custody of a public works contract, the production of a DURC, within the period of its effectiveness, is useful not only for the purpose of participating in the race, but is also capable of proving the status of regular or irregular contributions of Article 75 DPR 554/1999, so once the legislature has normed space of time within which a DURC must be considered valid (in this case covered until the award stage and had not allowed a regularity later), its effectiveness is in all respects for which is relevant in the context of a race.
Nor can it be assumed that the application of the ministerial decree occurred.
For the administrative procedure law lacks a general rule, as in other jurisdictions (for example, German), the applicable law in relation to the various stages of proceedings (initiative, investigation, decision-making and effectiveness of integrative) establishing the scope of applicability of the innovative supervening legislation (the so-called new right).
This discipline does exist in criminal law (and be deemed to apply also to criminal proceedings) to 'Article 2 of the Criminal Code, the so-called iperretroattività more lenient criminal law and the law applies only the worst for the future, the principle is shown on the tax law, since the new legislation is always linked to the current ability to pay (Article 53 of the Constitution); exist in substantive law and in the calendar which the law unless there is expressed, does not have that in the future (Article 11 of preleggi), whereas in the case law under that Article 11 is intended to apply immediately back to the right processes are still pending, because it is not yet exhausted.
With regard to the effectiveness of the annulment of judgments of the Constitutional Court has established principle that relationships are intangible covered by the court or be exhausted, and are subject to futility, the so-called reports are pending.
For the administrative procedure law merely regulates the time of conclusion of the proceedings in Article 2 of Law 241 of 1990, but the rules applicable in relation to temporal stages of proceedings.
however, that the general principle tempus actum regit on the basis of which the conventional wisdom believes that the new rules are invoked when the process has already spent basically the most significant phase of the matter is, as in this case is the case with the award the race.
The administrative procedure is governed by the principle tempus actum regit (ex plurimis on this principle the State Council, IV, 08/06/2007, n.3027), which implies that the legitimacy of a measure must be assessed in relation to standards in force at the time when the same shall be adopted in relation substantial interests protected at that stage of the proceedings (in this case the phase of tenders to the final phase of the future decision-making and adjudication).
Conclusively, it was not relied on the ministerial decree subsequent to the granting of a period of tolerance for the regularization.
5.For the foregoing, the appeal is upheld, and the reform of the contested decision, the appeal must be dismissed at first instance.
There are good reasons to place between the parties, the compensation of the costs of two levels.

PQM

The Council of State in the courts, the fourth section, finally pronouncing on the application signed below, hereby orders:
accept the appeal and, by way of appeal ruling, dismissed the action brought in the first instance. Offset costs. Sort
that this decision is carried out by the administrative authority.
Decided in Rome in chambers on February 10, 2009, with the intervention of judges: John Vacirca

President Armando Luigi Pozzi
Maruotti Councillor Councillor Anthony
Anastasi
Councilor Councilor Sergio De Felice, ext. The author
THE PRESIDENT
Sergio De Felice Giovanni Vacirca


THE SECRETARY
Rosario Giorgio Carnabuci

Filed in the Secretary
The
12/3/2009 (Art. 55, L. 27/4/1982, n. 186)
For / The Manager
Dr. Joseph Testa

How Many Monsters Energy

State Council, sect. V, May 11, 2009, No 2874

ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE

The Council of State in the courts (Section Five) gives the following

DECISION

on appeal nrg 4174 of 2007, proposed by the Company Health No local 2 of Turin, in the person of the gale-representative pro tempore, represented and assisted by Professors Mario E. Comba and Mario Sanino and address for service in the second study in Rome, Viale Parioli No 180;

against

society LARA Construction Ltd., headquartered in Sant 'Antimo, in the person of the sole and legal represen-tative pro tempore, Mr.. Rocco Lamino on his own and as leader of ATI being established between Lara and Construction Ltd Domus Art Ltd and the company Domus Art Ltd. headquartered in Villaricca, in the person of the sole and legal representative pro tempore, Mr.. Francesco De Rosa on his own and as principal of ATI Construction Ltd being established between Lara and Do-Art Music Ltd, represented and defended by the lawyer. prof. Frederick Te-deschini and since. Francesco Accarino, with an address at their studio in Rome, Largo Mexico, No 7;

and against

MIE Society Ltd., represented by its legal representative pro tempore;
the Building Fund of the Province of Florence, established in Florence, Via Lorenzo il Magnifico No 10, in the person of its President and legal representative pro tempore, Riccardo Spagnoli, repre-sented by professor and defense. adv. Andrea Del Re and since. Lucio Nicolais and address for service at the office of second-do in Rome square Mazzini, No 27;
the Building Fund of the Province of Perugia, in the person of the gale-representative pro tempore, represented and defended by the lawyer. Joseph Berellini and address for service in Rome, Via Cola di Rienzo, No 111, with D'Amato law firm Curatola;
the Building Fund of the Province of Naples, in its legal representative pro tempore;
the Building Fund of the Province of Caserta, in the person of the gale-representative pro tempore;
Company Financial Roman spa, in its legal representative pro tempore;

for reform of the Regional Administrative Court of the Piedmont No 3360, 31 October 2007;
view of the action with its attached;
In view of appearance in court of the parties mentioned above, the memories
Views from Parties in support of re-hearing perspectives;
Given all the acts of the case;
Rapporteur, public hearing on June 24, 2008, the Councillor Cesare Lamberti and heard, also, lawyers and Sanino Accarino, Tedeschini, Berellini and Nicolais;
held and considered the facts and law in the following.

FACT 1. Lara Construction Ltd. The company participated in a consortium of companies with companies Domus Art Srl at public auction held by the Company Sanitaria Locale No 2, for the construction organization works to extend restructuring and Martini Hospital in Turin. Is allotted the race, according to the communication of 1 August 2006, offering a discount of 19.508% on a starting price under art. 21 co. 1 letter. b) of Act No 11 February 1994 109.
1.1. With a note of the Director of ASL on June 7, 2006 prot. No 433/20/MTL/gn, was communicated to tenderers who "received the attached statements in which although not complete, has highlighted the irregular contributions respectively: Lara Construction Ltd - INPS investigation, Domus Art - EC investigation. Therefore asked to verify your position in order to have the information necessary for a definition of custody. "
1.2. By a note dated 15.09.2006 the Construction Lara passed the ASL 2 - Piedmont Region, certification of the Building Fund of Caserta on 14.09.2006 in which, after stating that "the company Domus Art Ltd (...) has been reported to the irregular Enterprise National Bank, as it was by carrying out the payment in April 2006, "testified that a subsequent audit conducted," the company had regularly run such a transfer to an account of our being in the banking extinction. Therefore, pending updated BNI, certifying that the company Domus ART Srl is in order with this Building Fund. " On September 15, 2006, the Bank of Naples Building ART released the Domus Srl a certificate stating the correctness of the same firm to pay on 7.9.2006.
1.3. The INPS headquarters in Naples sent directly to ASL No 2 and for the knowledge society Lara Construction Ltd, the declaration prot. nr. DM 5119023496 dated 12.09.2006, in which "in reference to the request for certification of regularity con-butiva, please be informed that, based on the evidence so far ac-quirements, in the company address, recorded at this location in class "construction industry", Tax Code / VAT 03233741218, with a monthly average num-ber, reported last year, nine employees, can be considered in good standing with the performance of the obligations of payment of social security and welfare. "
2. The two health agencies in Turin-check-rule authority to pay the Domus Art and DURC on 10/05/2006 was that on August 2, 2006 there was an irregularity in regard to the contribution of the Speaker's Construction Perugia and Florence.
2.1. The contracting authority the statement was sent on October 16, 2006, the Building Fund of the Province of Perugia, which showed that "the payment of the complaint the names of the voratori-occupied for the month of June 2006 was carried hoc basis with bank on 07/31/2006 and that on the complaint in July 2006 08.31.2006 ago date, both within the time allowed by our rules. The signal at the BNI of payment dates subsequent to those mentioned above is do-vuta the fact that the same bank has credited the sums paid by you with date, respectively, 7.8.2006 and 5.9.2006, as bit by the accounting check-tete attached.
2.2. The Building Fund of the Province of Florence stated, by a note dated October 23, 2006 prot. No 658, that payment of the Domus Art for the month of June 2006 was by you by carrying out our account on 07.08.2006 (date of improving the human finger). Therefore, the writer reported the irregularities to the Banca dati nazionale imprese irregolari e la successiva regolarizzazione verificatasi in data 7.8.2006. Vi precisiamo che il regolamento non fa riferimento alla data di ordine del bonifico o alla predi-sposizione dello stesso, ma alla data della effettuazione del ver-samento nella fattispecie risultante il 7.8.2006 (data di accredi-to)”. A chiarimento della data in cui era stato effettuato il bonifi-co, la Banca Popolare di Ancona, con nota del 18.10.2006 in-viata alla Cassa Edile di Firenze, confermò “di aver ricevuto istruzioni circa l’evasione dello stesso in data 31.07.2006 dalla Domus Art s.r.l. Per quanto sopra siamo più che certi che even-tuali ritardi nella contabilizzazione della citata scrittura sono da imputarsi a problematiche tecniche and not the least im-utable to preg.ma ns. customer. " It is on record the order of bo-ning of the Domus Art for € 444.00, on 31/07/2006, to im-party beneficiary with Banca Popolare di Ancona case Construction of Florence for the qualifying period on June 2006.
3. Despite Lara construction company had sent the documentation do-October 23, 2006, the Health, with deliberations No 259/C/20/06, 14.11.2006, has not made the final award of the contract to ATI Lara construction, as the document of Social Domus Art Company Ltd. has certified that the company did not is regular with the payment of contributions the Building Fund of the province of Naples, said the company allotted MIE Ltd based in Chieri.
3. Against the measures, the setting up time-Mediterranean Association has appealed to the Tar Piedmont three reasons, namely:
3.1. Violation of Article. 2, ln 266/2002 and Articles. 3 and 6, ln 241/1990. And 'the erroneous assumption of irregular pay-ment of the Domus Art Building Fund of Naples, which collects data on the company provided by the other speakers Construction, having the company based in the province of Naples. The irregularity resulting from the certificate of 11.06.2006 (about the payments to the Building Fund of the Florence and Perugia) is belied by the tem-Pesto versamento dei contributi sia alla Cassa Edile di Perugia (che infatti, ha rettificato la propria precedente dichiarazione) sia a quella di Firenze, che invece ha continuato a sostenere di aver ricevuto il versamento in data 8.8.2006, quindi 8 giorni dopo il termine ultimo di scadenza. Secondo la Convenzione tra gli Enti Previdenziali, l’impresa è in regola quando ha versato i contri-buti e gli accantonamenti dovuti, compresi quelli relativi all’ultimo mese per il quale è scaduto l’obbligo di versamento all’atto della richiesta di certificazione. I versamenti sono stati effettuati in data 31.7.2006 (l’irregolarità riferita alla Cassa Edile di Caserta per i versamenti dell’aprile 2006 è stata superata come attestato in the note, 14.9.2006 prot. nr. 0011677), as acknowledged by Case Construction of Perugia, which has adjusted its previous certification.
3.1.1. Building the case of Naples mistakenly testified that the company Domus Art would not be in compliance with the payment of contributions as at 2 August 2006 and that for the period "June 2006", the company was subsequently rectified its position, will pay the amount with a value of 8 August 2006 and is credited with the irregular payment of contributions in respect of Building Speakers of Perugia and Florence. The ASL would not have given weight to the adjustment of the Building Fund of Perugia and the timely payment to one of Florence and was awarded the contract unlawful-timamente the other party. The certainty of payment contribution can not be derived from the date of the currency given by the bank, but only on the factual and historical data of payment by the deadline, co-me is the date of execution of the payment.
3.2. Violation of Article. 2, ln 266/2002 and Articles. 3, 6, 10, l.. No 241/1990. The Court of Justice, with the ruling C226/04 of 09.02.2006 stated that the concept of regular contributions, it is relevant for the purposes of participation in a public works contract must be considered in light of the seriousness of the infringement, on the finality of the investigations and the existence of a liability. Non qual-siasi inadempimento (e, nel caso di specie, qualsiasi violazione degli obblighi contributivi) è sufficiente a determinare l’esclusione da una gara di appalto per l’esecuzione di lavori pubblici, ma solo una violazione che possa ritenersi grave. Nel caso di specie, l’A.S.L. non avrebbe minimamente considerato la irrisorietà della somma in contestazione ammontante ad euro 44,00 e la non gravità della presunta inadempienza. Non ha inol-tre tenuto conto della rettifica pervenuta dalla Cassa Edile di Pe-rugia e dell’assunzione di responsabilità da parte della Banca Popolare di Ancona in ordine al mancato accredito entro il ter-mine del 31.07.2006, ma con valuta 08.08.2006, in favore della Cassa Edile di Firenze.
3.3. Violation of Article. 2. Ln 266/2002 and non-application of art. 4 of 15 April 2004 (Convention for the release of the Document of Social Security) INPS approved by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy with a note of 12.07.2005 - Violation and Failure to apply art. Circular No 3 25.07.2005 INAIL 38 - Breach of art and man-ed application. Circular No 3 26.07.2005 92 INPS - Breach note the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy prot. No 3144, 22.12.2005. E 'wrong what the Building Fund of the Province of Florence in the footnote 658 FF / b, 23.10.2006 of the date of crediting the payment date to be considered as the only regular contributions to establish whether or not the company. The agreement under Article. 2, co. 2 of Legislative Decree no. 210/2002 (agreement of 04.15.2004) from INPS, INAIL Speakers and Construction, makes no reference to the date of ac-credit amounts, which may occur at a later time-tive practices of the Institute for Banking.
4. In the first instance will consist of the ASL No 2 Regione Piemonte, and the defendant, MIE Inc., claiming the invalidity of the merits of the appeal. They constituted judicial uncle Building Fund of the Province of Naples and the Building Fund of the Province of Florence.
4.1. With additional grounds notified on 21 and 22 February 2007, the company Lara Construction Ltd. appealed the decision not to act after the award of the contract, claiming a breach of Articles. 3, 6 and 10 of Law No 241/1990, Articles. 11, 12, 77, 78, 79 and 80 of Legislative Decree no. 163/2006 and art. Ln 2 of 266/2002 is proposing the same vices already proposed warn-know the contested measures with the use and derivative use in relation to further acts. The applicant alleges the unlawful award of the contract with the respondent, as the contested measures do not show that the ASL has verified the re-quirements of the same pursuant to Article 11 of Legislative Decree no. 163/2006.
5. With the sentence hereof, the Administrative Court to Re-gional Piedmont, rejected the exception of the lack of passive-gittimazione Building Fund of the Province of Florence and the Province of Naples and the Appeal declared inadmissible for lack of injury, against the following acts: - Note the local health 2 - Piedmont Region - Logistics Technical Depart-ment - Complex - Engineering We vile-prot. No 433/20/MTL/gn, 7.9.2006;-known case of the Florence Building prot. No 658 FF / b, 23.10.2006;-art. 6 of the Regulations of the Building Fund of the Province of Florence-Response Database Enterprise Irregulars of 6.10.2006, in response to the request of 05.10.2006.
5.1. The ruling however, upheld the appeal with reference to the Note of ASL No 2 Regione Piemonte prot. No 8077/20/MTL/RP del 16.11.2006, alla deliberazione del Com-missario Straordinario dell’Azienda sanitaria n. 259/C/20/06 del 14.11.2006 nota prot. n. 9044/20/MTL/Rp della A.S.L. n. 2 di ri-chiesta di escussione della garanzia fideiussoria determinazione del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale - Regione Piemonte - Azienda Sanitaria locale n. 2 - Torino - Struttura S.C. Ingegneria n. 12/20/2006 del 05.12.2006 Documento Unico di Regolarità Contributiva redatto dalla Cassa Edile della Provincia di Napoli il 07.12.2006, sull’assunto che l’amministrazione aggiudicatrice non avrebbe correttamente motivato e valutato, in contrasto con gli articoli 3, 6, e 10 della legge n. 241/1990, la non gravità delle infrazioni commesse e avrebbe in ciò also violated Article 75 of Decree And 17 of Presidential Decree No. 554/1999 34/2000 (applicable ratione temporis to tender), as was suggested by the European Court of Justice ruling C.226/04, 9.2.2006.
5.2. The ruling upheld for the same part, the reasons are added and, consequently, reversed the following acts: record of the transactions to Tender No 172 of 31.07.2006, with which it was decided not to proceed, ex art. 2, l. 266/02, the award of the public company to spell Lara Construction Ltd in JV with Do-mus Art Ltd and have been awarded to the company MIE Ltd. - No contract Rep. 178 of 20.12.2006, for the realization of extension and renovation works Presidio of hospital-border Martini; cannot tunnel and outside emergency staircase, partial renovation of the operative delivery, new electrical substation; letter prot. No 395/20/MTL/RP/oc local health 2 - Piedmont Region - Logistics Technical Depart-ment - SC Civil Engineering of 18.01.2007, to authorize the Director of Works "to ensure the formal delivery of the work day January 19, 2007 at 11:30 am in compliance with art. 129 paragraph 1 DPR 554/99;-verbal delivery of the work on 19.01.2006;
5.3. The verdict has finally accepted the request for compensation equivalent to Article 35 of Decree No for legislation 80/1998 the part of the work already performed by the other party.
6. The ruling was appealed by the Company Sanitaria Locale No 2 of Turin.
6.1. Have formed the company in court that Lara Construction Ltd., in the defense sought review of the grounds, and absorptive Casse Construction of the Province of Florence and Perugia who insist on their lack of capacity to be sued.
6.2. The case is the decision in open court on 24 June 2008.

LAW

1. With the contested decision of the Administrative Court to Re-gional Piedmont, was canceled the exclusion of temporary grouped among the companies Lara Construction Ltd Domus Art Ltd and the invitation to tender issued by the Company Sanitaria Locale No 2, for the expansion and renovation Marti-ni Hospital of Turin, for irregularities in the certification pay.
1.1. In particular, the decision, in favor of the complaints brought in the application, set aside the exclusion of measures taken by the race of the Health and re-applied for enforcement of the bank guarantee and the Document of Social Security prepared by the Building Fund the Province of Naples, as the contracting was not properly motivated and assessed the severity of the infringement, in violation of the principles on the proper motivation provvedimenti lesivi dei partecipanti alle pubbliche gare e dei principi contenuti nella sentenza C.226/04 del 9 febbraio 2006 della Corte di Giustizia CE, confermati dalla costante giuri-sprudenza amministrativa.
1.2. In accoglimento dei motivi aggiunti, la sentenza ha annullato il verbale delle operazioni di gara del 31 luglio 2006, con il quale è stata dichiarata aggiudicataria la ditta M.I.E. s.r.l., in luogo della ricorrente Lara Costruzioni s.r.l. in associazione con Do-mus Art s.r.l. nonché gli atti di approvazione del contratto e l’autorizzazione al direttore dei lavori di procedere alla formale consegna dei lavori il giorno 19 gennaio 2007.
1.3. E’ stata infine accolta nei modi previsti dall’art. 35, D.Lgs. n. 80/1998, la richiesta di risarcimento del danno per equivalen-te, sola formulata dall’associazione ricorrente Lara Costruzioni, per la parte dei lavori già eseguiti dall’impresa controinteressata, con assegnazione del termine di sei mesi dalla pubblicazione della sentenza all’Azienda sanitaria, per proporre alla ricorrente una somma da corrispondere a titolo di risarcimento del danno ingiusto e con la fissazione di criteri per la formulazione della proposta stessa.
2. Dei motivi di appello contenuti nell’atto introduttivo, va in-nanzitutto rigettato quello concernente il difetto di giurisdizione del giudice adito sul contratto Rep. n. 178 del 20 dicembre 2006, per la realizzazione dell’ampliamento e ristrutturazione del Pre-sidio Ospedaliero Martini entered into between the contractor, company MIE and the Company and the local health care subsequent acts of the Company (authorization for the project manager to undertake the delivery and oral delivery of work) for which the examination above in a logical order.
2.1. Compared to the claim for damages made by the applicant for the annulment of the contract, donated to the knowledge of the judicial ordinary there, stands as a logical premise of taking over the position of the bidder, when required as compensation for specific performance under Article. 35 of Legislative Decree no. 80/1998.
2.1.1. The subject of the application of Lara construction company was instead damages equivalent to, which was dismissed by the Administrative Court in the form of a proposal from the hospital by the Company of an amount to correspond with the harm, after determining the relevant criteria, both overall competence of the administrative court (cons. State Ad. Plen. No 9 / 2008 and No. 12/2008).
2.1.2. If there is no need to examine the relationship which exists between the contracting and the successful tenderer to carry out the amount of damages, is irrelevant to the inquiry to decide on jurisdiction.
2.2. E ', similarly irrelevant to the decision, the committee de-acts from the award (authorization to proceed delivery and delivery report of proceedings), also canceled sides by decision at first instance, since the activity due to the purely material and final report, which examined the ge-elusive knowledge of the administrative courts.
2.2.1. The exceptions are therefore to be rejected.
3. It should also be rejected, for the reasons you say, the lack of down-recoverable under the court as to the content of the document of regular contributions, issued by the relevant insurance bodies to assess the fairness of the exclusion of competitors from the race whenever the same contribution to the bonds is based on non-performance and pre-butions therein certified.
3.1. In its application, and additional reasons, the exception is introduced in the aspect of violation of Articles. 442 co.1. co.3 and 444. Code, relinquished to the ordinary jurisdiction of disputes with-on the obligations of employers and the enforcement of civil penalties for breach of those obligations.
3.1.1. E ', however, clear that the diversity of the ballot makes the ordinary courts on social security rights of the worker who is as-sumono violated, the court imposed with respect to judicial administrative layer on their proper performance, as evidenced by a certificate of regular contributions, introduced by 'Art. 2 of Decree No 210/2002, conv. ln 266/2002- that undertakings entrusted with a public contract shall be submitted to the contracting authority, on pain of revocation of custody.
3.1.2. In determining the non-payment of contributions to the pension institution, the poll of the court's purpose is the existence of the right of the employee to contribuzio-tion on the business and given the right to pensions in proportion : rights viola-from which springs from the penalty and the liability for compensation by the employer against an employee, according to the general principles laid down in Art. 1223 and 1225 cc (Court of Cassation, sez. Lav., December 13, 1983, No. 7358, Cass., Sec. A., June 26, 1986, n. 4254). In the contro-sie relating to procurement procedures for works, services or suppliership by parties bound by the proceedings of public evidence, the judge under investigation is the mere re-certification irregularity produced attesting to its regular contributions to the participating Public procurement, which represents the regulatory requirements for the eligibility of the field mission in the tender (Cass., Sec. A., December 11, 2007, No. 25818).
3.1.3. The evaluation of the court therefore does not invest the rule authority to pay the company admitted to participate in a race, as envisaged in the generic reference to the obligations arising out of a work of art. 75, Presidential Decree No. 554/1999. Compared to it, diversity the rules introduced by Law Decree 210/2002 has already been highlighted in the Chamber, which he attributed to regular contributions, evidenced by the single document, the character of a true requirement for participation in the tender (cons. State, V, October 23, 2007, No. 5574; August 25, 2008 No 4035).
3.2. In this respect, the union is admissible Jun-ruling proceedings of this single regular contributions (Durch), whose character is a declaration of science, to be placed between the documents for certification or written statement by a public official data available to the government (TAR Lom-Bard Milan, I, 8 May 2008, No 1415), is no impediment to the evaluation delle conseguenze che la stazione appaltante abbia tratto dal suo contenuto ai fini dell’aggiudicazione.
3.2.1. L’autonomia del procedimento di rilascio della certifica-zione di regolarità contributiva rispetto al procedimento di gara, l’affidamento della verifica sulla regolarità ad un’amministrazione diversa da quella che indice la gara e l’assoggettamento delle contribuzioni alle regole proprie della materia previdenziale, non impediscono che il documento di re-golarità contributiva possa essere sindacato dall’aggiudicataria sotto il profilo della rispondenza di quanto ivi attestato ai requi-siti richiesti dalla legge e dalla lex specialis per l’aggiudicazione delle gare di pertinenza della p.a..
3.2.2. They do not involve a different solution content learned by the health de-Construction of the provinces of Florence and Perugia, cir-ca the private nature of Pension Funds and their functions to report to the national database-the BNI in the case of non- date with their social security payments, under the Conven-tion of April 15, 2004 entered into between the same speakers and the Institutes of Social Security and insurance against accidents, finalized the adoption of common technical and organizational measures to simplify the issue of DURC
3.2.3. Aside the observation that the private nature of these speakers does not preclude the performance of public function, the Board notes that the burden imposto dalla citata Convenzione agli enti di previdenza (fra cui le Casse Edili pro-vinciali) di segnalare mensilmente alla B.N.I. l’elenco delle im-prese non in regola e l’obbligo degli enti stessi (contenuto nella delibera n. 4/2005 del Comitato per la Bilateralità) di inserire nell’elenco delle imprese irregolari quelle che non effettuano il versamento dei contributi entro il mese successivo a quello di ri-ferimento, hanno carattere puramente convenzionale e non legi-slativo. Non impediscono perciò che la stazione appaltante possa valutare la gravità della violazione ad opera dell’impresa aggiu-dicataria circa la regolarità contributiva come rappresentata dalla certificazione prima di procedere alla revoca dell'affidamento.
3.2.4. The provisions of art. 2, co. 1 of Decree 210/2002, the automatic revocation of a load dell'affidataria, sanctioning na, indeed the objective fact is not providing to the contracting-tion of the certificate on the regular contributions and-goes to pay the deficiency in themselves and itself. The operator follows the failure to submit, and not to be in good standing with the contributions. The latter circumstance, in the absence of di-dicated in the lex specialis, should be assessed in relation to gravity by the awarding entity.
3.2.5. In the context of art. 29, of Council Directive June 18, 1992, 92/50 (violation of the obli-gations and social security tax by the firms awarded), the Court of Justice has clarified that, regarding the causes of exclusion it is for the Member States to determine the extent infringement and the conditions of exclusion. The "they-re not in compliance with its obligations" established by the national legislature, in public procurement, to lead to exclusion from the tender without further evaluation, must find a precise location has it-in procedure for the award, which can indifferent mind-match presentation of the application for participation in the tender, the submission of bids, the award-tion of the contract (EC Court Justice, sec. I, 9 February 2006, C-226/04 and C-228/04).
3.2.6. Nation that the legislature has not covered the material consequences of the failure implies that the station ap-paltante must comply with the principles of transparency and equal treatment, under which the substantive and proce-dural associated with participation in a contract must be clearly defined in advance, so that persons may know exactly the procedural requirements and be policy-holders that the same requirements apply for all competitors (see EC Court Justice, C-226/04 and C-228 / 04, in part.: paragraph 32).
3.2.7. In this regard, the only criterion dictated by the legislature national dock where the failure is that of "serious infrazio-ni" ... ... duly established. any other obligation arising from employment relationships ", contained in art. 75, par. 1., Lett. e) Decree No. 554/1999 (in the text of art. 2, Presidential Decree No 412/2000). In-fractions whose gravity (€ 441.00 recorded against the Building Fund of Florence and the same with regard to the Building Fund of Perugia) was correctly placed, by the sentence, in relation to the amount of notice and reliance engendered by the station contractor that has established a contradiction with the company in its letter of 7 September 2006, when, following the acquisition del primo D.U.R.C., si invitava l’aggiudicataria a verificare la pro-pria posizione contributiva.
3.3. Risulta in tal modo infondato, oltre al secondo motivo di ap-pello e dei motivi aggiunti, anche il terzo motivo, che censurano la sentenza per avere ritenuto l’Azienda sanitaria obbligata a va-lutare la gravità dell’inadempimento.
3.3.1. Una volta aperta l’istruttoria sulla rilevanza e sul conte-nuto delle irregolarità da parte della stessa stazione appaltante, questa non può sottrarsi all’onere di valutare i chiarimenti richie-sti venendo meno al legittimo affidamento ingenerato nella par-tecipante sulla disponibilità dell’Amministrazione ad accogliere i chiarimenti eventualmente forniti.
3.3.2. La sentenza ha dato atto, al proposito, che la Cassa Edile di Firenze ha affermato che il versamento della società Domus Art relativo al mese di giugno 2006 era stato effettuato il 31 lu-glio 2006 ma era stato accreditato in data 7 agosto 2006. Nella stessa data erano state segnalate l’irregolarità e la successiva re-golarizzazione alla Banca Dati Nazionale. Ancora, nella decisio-ne si afferma che la Cassa Edile di Perugia ha rettificato la pre-cedente dichiarazione, circa il versamento dei contributi relativi al mese di giugno 2006 da parte della Domus Art: avvenuto in data 31 luglio 2006, ultimo giorno utile per il versamento, era stato accreditato però solo l’8 agosto 2006. In entrambi i casi dalla certificazione D.U.R.C., gli obblighi contributions do not re-Sultan met, although the payments were being made.
3.3.3. It does not seem relevant in this regard that, in the act of creation, the Building Fund for the Province of Perugia have c-ceived, in addition to payments for the month of June 2006 was also the late payment of the following month, reached Sept. 5 and not July 31, 2006. Even in this case, the payments were in favor of the Fund following the award in favor of the applicant Lara construction but prior to the request for information addressed by the contracting on September 7, 2008; clarification that, once given, could not be obliterated expectations of the race with a new contractor.
3.3.4. That being the exceptions do not appear to be shared Banks Construction of Florence and Perugia irregularities of companies who insist on carrying out payments, because later than the end of the month following the reference required by Resolution No. 4 / 2005 of the Committee for the bilateral. Although DURC issued against the applicant group meets the conventional rules contained in the aforementioned resolution, the absence of gross misconduct con-tributed was proven by the declarations of the same case construction, designed to restore regular contributions to the effective ac-Credit of amounts paid and not the date on which the payment had happened.
3.3.5. E 'therefore, worthy of confirmation of the decision under appeal that have considered poor measure of the motivational system of the company health-not to proceed with final award in favor of the applicant because it is not regular with the payment of contributions despite the evidence requested and given.
3.3.6. In the particular case the statements of the construction funds have played a key role in relations between the ATI applicant and the contracting. The sentence is, therefore, yet be confirmed in so far rejected the lack of legitimate passive-tion still required by the Banks Building, having assessed l’intera vicenda processuale ed il comportamento tenuto sia dall’Azienda ospedaliera che dalle Casse medesime.
4. La sentenza è, infine da confermare, anche per ciò che attiene il risarcimento del danno, siccome liquidato in relazione alla concreta fattispecie, dove la scarsa chiarezza di comportamento degli enti previdenziali imponeva alla Stazione appaltante speci-fica attenzione nel valutare le risultanze istruttorie.
4.1. Anche se il raggruppamento ricorrente non ha dato prova concreta del danno subito dall’impossibilità di utilizzare le pro-prie maestranze in altri lavori, correttamente la decisione impu-gnata ha ritenuto evidente il pregiudizio per la mancata aggiudi-cazione definitiva, in quanto era collocata per prima in gra-duatoria and consequently in a good position to carry out the works.
4.1.1. E 'is therefore legitimate to commensurate loss of profit to the extent of ten per cent of the price-based auction, as low in the applicant under Article 345, L. March 20, 1865 No At 2248. F and taking into account that the pooling applicant did not have any cost for the execution of the work except that required for the submission of tenders.
4.2. It 'also unexceptionable finding of guilt in the behavior of the contracting authority after having given over to be heard with the company on the findings of DURC and engendered OF AWARD custody cases where clarifications were positive, gave rise to the award in favor of the runner-up.
4.2.1. Moreover, the same decision that has enabled the Administration to propose, pursuant to art. 35 co. 2 Legislative Decree no. 80/1998, a sum by way of claim for damages to be paid to the applicant with "the temperament of the case, the assumption is sufficient to be taken into account in the equitable settlement of the lack of clarity in the behavioral treatment of social security administrations in certifying re-irregularity of contributions of member companies of the group.

4.3. There is no need, given the rejection of the appeal, consider the pleas taken up by the decision at first instance, as requested by the grouping Lara Construction.
5. The sentence should therefore be fully confirmed, an-that if the peculiarities of the story and the lack of a complete legal framework on the DURC justifies wide-mind reasons in order to cover the costs of proceedings between the parties relating to the second level of review .

PQM

The Council of State in the courts, Section Five, rejected the appeal.
offset expenses. Sort
that this decision is made by the administrative-l'Autorità. Decided in
Rome, the Council of State in the courts (Section Five), in chambers on June 24, 2008, with the intervention of the Lords: The Medical
Domenico
President Cesare Lamberti Outside Director
Filoreto D'Agostino Director
Aniello Cerreto Councillor Nicholas Russo Director

The Extender The President
f.to Cesare Lamberti f.to Dominic Medical

Secretary

FILED IN OFFICE
the ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 11/05/2009.
(Art. 55 L. 27.4.1982, n. 186)
THE EXECUTIVE
f.to Livia Patroni Griffi

What Plantar Warts Look Like When They're Dying

COUNCIL OF STATE Sec. V, May 19, 2009, No 3072

REPUBLIC ITALIAN - N. REG.DEC 3072/09.
IN THE NAME OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE N.1977 REG. RIC.

The Council of State in the courts (Fifth Chamber)
YEAR 2008 gives the following

DECISION

appeal in writing to the NRG 1977 \\ 2008, proposed by Julius Pappas, represented and defended by Antonio Facondo and address for service at the Chambers of C. Head in Rome, Via Aurelia No 190;

against

City of Trani, in the person of the mayor pro tempore, represented and defended by Antonio Deramo, residing in Rome, via Cosseria No 2 at Dr. Alfredo Placidi;

and against

company of Andrea Cassese Cassese Gennaro & C. sas, in its legal representative pro tempore, and Giuseppe Sole proprietorship Dolphins, both represented and defended by lawyers Tania Enza Cassander and Emanuele Tomasicchio, address for service in Rome, via Brussels No 59, at the Chambers of Cassander.

for the reform of the Judgement of the Regional Administrative Court of Puglia, the third section, no 136, February 1, 2008.
Given the appeal;
seen acts of formal proceedings of the town of Trani and Company Andrea Cassese Cassese's Gennaro & C. sas and sole proprietorship Dolphins Joseph
considering the pleadings submitted by the parties in support of their defenses;
seen all the acts of the case;
date to read the public hearing on March 24, 2009 the report of the Vito Poli, heard lawyers eloquence, by delegation of Notarnicola 'avv.to Deramo and Mastroviti delegation from the' avv.to Cassander;
thought and reasoned as follows:

fact and law

1. The town of Trani, by resolution giuntale No 280, July 24, 2000, decided, in accordance with order and on notice of the national and local public safety the funeral homes, which perform the processing of paperwork, are to be counted among the agencies business pursuant to art. 115 rd June 18, 1931, No 773 - consolidated text of the laws on public safety - and that there is a report of an agency every 25,000 inhabitants. With resolutions
giuntali nn. 309, 158, 10 August 2001 and May 22, 2002, the municipality, inter alios, and for our purposes, it confirmed the previous act of reaffirming GL and better specifying the meaning of the relationship of agency business every 25,000 inhabitants.
1.1. Determinations with local protocol. No 22928 of 12 July 2005, no 24035 of 21 August 2006, no 21944 of 17 May 2007, no 6869 September 5, 2007 have been refused permission or disqualified instances or allegations of logins (hereinafter dia) submitted by Mr. Pappas and Julie for opening an agency of the funeral home.
All refusals were motivated by the direct or indirect reference to Resolution No. 280 of 2000 and the report of an agency every 25,000 inhabitants of this introduction.
Some of these denials were contested before the Tar for Puglia.
1.2. Mr. Pappas submitted to the town of Trani, on September 21, 2007, should always be given yet another concerning the opening of a business agent for the processing of administrative funeral.
The town responded with determination prot. 42206 of October 22, 2007 merely quote in full the arguments previously spent to deny authorization for the agency.
1.3. Mr. Pappas act against that arose before the Tar Puglia for articulating five independent reasons.
2. The contested decision - Tar for Puglia, Section Three, No 136, February 1, 2008 -:
a) declared the application inadmissible for failure to timely notify at least one of the counterparties;
b) declared the application inadmissible for failure to timely resolutions giuntali No further appeal 280 of 2000 and 309, 2001;
c) has, however, dismissed the appeal on the merits;
d) rejected the application Damages;
s) ordered the applicant to pay the costs of litigation.
3. By application notified February 29, 2008, and filed on March 11, Mr. Pappas has appealed against the sentence mentioned on the Tar contesting all of them unfavorable.
4. Have formed the town of Trani and defendant companies deducting the admissibility of the appeal el'infondatezza in fact and law and proposing the exception does not examined by Tar-admissibility of the application at first instance, as an act directed against merely confirming previous denials.
5. The final decision is due to public hearing on March 24, 2009.
6. The appeal is unfounded and must be rejected.
Waiting to rebut the appeal panel is independent examination of the admissibility of a case of the same, the parties' intimate, in the light of the entry into force of the Regional Law 34 of December 15, 2008.
6.1. Takes value absorbing examination of the second ground of appeal which the appellant complains was inadmissible the application at first instance in terms of failure to timely appeal the decision no 280, 2000.
In support of its argument, the appellant submits that:
a) Resolution No. 309 of 2001 as it merely confirms the previous Resolution No. 280 and not specifically mentioned weighed in the decision, was not to be contested;
b) Resolution No. 280, No. 2000 and the subsequent 158 of 2002, as conflicting with the provisions and principles of constitutional and Community rules on fair competition, but should not be challenged directly by the administration and set aside by the court;
c) the resolutions establishing rules for the address, could not have been superseded by a subsequent act of address issued by the Special Commissioner of the town - prot. No 22,590 on May 18, 2007 - which urged the municipal offices to adjust to the opinion of the Guarantor for the competition and the market (hereinafter AGCM) protocol. No 0023709 on May 10, 2007. The half
is unfounded and must be rejected.
6.1.1. The section states, first, that the damage to the applicant's legal situation stems from Resolution No. 280 of 2000 which established the agency relationship of a funeral every 25,000 inhabitants, this resolution, widely known by the appellant through the disclosure of previous refusals to license (some of which are disputed in other reviews) was not timely appeal and not is not formally contested the action at first instance. The following resolutions
- nn. 309, 158, 2001 and 2002 - also not contested although harming themselves, confirm that extent, the ratio of an agency every 25,000 inhabitants.
6.1.2. This premesso, osserva il collegio che non può trovare ingresso la tesi della disapplicabilità delle su richiamate delibere.
Sul punto la sezione non intende discostarsi dagli approdi ermeneutici cui è giunta la giurisprudenza di questo Consiglio (cfr. Cons. St., sez. V, 8 settembre 2008, n. 4263; sez. IV, 21 febbraio 2005, n. 579; sez. V, 10 gennaio 2003, n. 35), secondo la quale la violazione del diritto comunitario implica un vizio di illegittimità – annullabilità dell’atto amministrativo con esso contrastante, mentre la nullità (o l’inesistenza) è configurabile nella sola ipotesi in cui il provvedimento nazionale sia stato adottato sulla base di una norma interna (attributiva del potere) incompatibile with Community law (and then applying them).
logical corollary of this reconstruction are:
a) a procedural standpoint, the burden of the appeal of the decision is contrary to Community law before the administrative court within the prescribed time-limit, failing which the inopposability;
b) the obligation for the administration to implement the act unless the illegitimate use of powers of self-defense.
In this case there is no rule - the rank of primary or secondary - that is inconsistent with Community law; contrast, in the abstract and the thesis, it is conceivable only on the related guidance documents having content that is not regulate.
6.1.3. Equally irrelevant is the call of the appellant with the opinion of the Antitrust Authority and to note the special commissioner, because:
a) the opinion AGCM relates to the transportation service actually funeral is to be considered in all respects liberalized, not already the most diverse and delicate area of \u200b\u200bthe funeral homes brokerage that are subjected to a police authorization issued by the municipality in mind the provisions of Articles. 115 rd June 18, 1931, No 773 and 163, Leg. March 31, 1998, No 112; the local authority, indeed, must review aspects of security, public order and prevention of crimes that constitute the ratio of subjection to permit the opening of the police agencies of business (see Constitutional Court. July 25, 2001, No. 290, Cass. Civ., sec. I, August 28, 2006, No. 18619);
b) Prefectural Commissioner's note does not constitute evidence, a new act of merely forwarding address, for the sake of knowledge, the opinion mentioned above AGCM council offices.
6.2. For completeness, the section is based also notes that the plea of \u200b\u200binadmissibility of the application at first instance, revived the defense of the town of Trani in the memory of May 5, 2008, and is merely confirmatory of the centers on the refusal issue in this case.
Indeed, an examination of all the information in the file, it is clear that the municipal authorities, with the note of October 22, 2007, without carrying out any preliminary investigation has been limited, purely and simply to repeat verbatim what has been agreed with the previous measures No 22928 of 2005, no 24035 of 2006 and 21,944 in 2007. Neither can be recognized, in the diagnosis of September 21, 2007, elements of novelty compared to all previous instances disregarded and below this angle are irrelevant communications of the AGCM and the Special Commissioner of concern both because, as already seen, the transport service funeral and because in no way have been taken into consideration by the a view to adopting a note dated October 22, 2007.
On this point the section does not intend to depart from the traditional view (see Cons. St., sect. V, 4 March 2008, n. 797, sect. V, April 12, 2005, No. 1645, sect. IV, 27 November 1998 , No. 1637), which excludes the grip of the acts by which merely confirms the administration simply relies on a determination previously adopted, without a new investigation and a reassessment of the facts and law already considered, or other new, acquired in the meantime. In these cases must be regarded as non-actionable flows, for one thing, the recognition of the absolute lack of interest in obtaining the annulment of judicial review, since its elimination from the legal world would not be able to remove a lesion in any case due at the time confirmed when this has not been challenged, and second, vice versa if the latter has already been contested, 's futility of imposing a burden on appeal of acts that come to be content with a mere reproduction of other already burdened the courts and to be overwhelmed by the annulment of the first. The multiple
's appeal inadmissible originating far ESTABLISHED exempt the college from an examination of further means of appeal.
7. In conclusion, the appeal must be dismissed.
Court fees, regulated according to the criterion of ordinary unsuccessful, are awarded in the device.

PQM

The Council of State in the courts (Section V), finally pronouncing on the application in detail in the epigraph:
- rejects the appeal and confirmed the effect of the decision under appeal;
- condemns' appellant to pay in favor of the town of Trani and the Business of Andrea Cassese Cassese Gennaro & C. sas and Giuseppe Sole proprietorship Dolphins
costs, fees and responsibilities of these proceedings that the liquid in a total of EUR 3.000,00 (three thousand/00) plus accessories come per legge (spese generali al 12,50%, I.V.A. e C.P.A.), in favore di ciascuna parte.
Ordina che la presente decisione sia eseguita dall’Autorità amministrativa.
Così deciso in Roma, nella camera di consiglio del 24 marzo 2009, con la partecipazione di:
Raffaele Iannotta - Presidente
Cesare Lamberti - Consigliere
Claudio Marchitiello - Consigliere
Vito Poli Rel. Estensore - Consigliere
Giancarlo Montedoro - Consigliere
ESTENSORE IL PRESIDENTE
F.to Vito POLI F.to Raffaele Iannotta

DEPOSITATA IN SEGRETERIA
il 19/05/2009
(Art. 55 L. 27/4/1982, n. 186)
P. IL DIRIGENTE
Dott.ssa Livia Patroni Griffi

Cargo Nets With Small Holes

Court of Justice of European Communities, Section IV, May 19, 2009 Case C-538/2007

Corte di Giustizia delle Comunità Europee, sezione IV, 19 maggio 2009, causa C-538/2007
E' contraria al diritto comunitario una norma nazionale (art. 34, comma 2, d.lgs. n. 163 del 2006) che stabilisca un divieto assoluto, a carico di imprese in situazioni di controllo o collegamento, di partecipare alla stessa gara d’appalto, senza lasciare loro la possibilità di dimostrare che il rapporto suddetto non ha influito sul loro rispettivo comportamento nell’ambito di tale gara

SENTENZA DELLA CORTE (Quarta Sezione)

19 maggio 2009

«Direttiva 92/50/CEE – Art. 29, primo comma – Appalti pubblici services - National legislation does not authorize participation in the same procedure for the award, concurrently, of companies with between them a relationship of control or decisive influence "

In Case C-538/07, concerning

preliminary ruling under Article. 234 EC by the Lombardy Regional Administrative Court by decision of 14 November 2007, received on 3 December 2007 in Case

Assitur Srl v

Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture of Milan and against

of SDA Express Courier SpA, the Italian Post SpA,

THE COURT (Fourth Chamber), composed of

. K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, R. Lapuerta de Silva, by D. E. Juhász (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Malenovský, judges,
: sig. J. Mazák
Registrar: L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator
view the written procedure and further hearing on December 4, 2008,
considering the observations submitted
- for Assitur Srl, by. S. Quadrio,
- for the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture of Milan, by. M. Bassani;
- the SDA Express Courier SpA, by A. Vallefuoco and V. Vallefuoco;
- the Italian Post SpA, by. A. Fratini;
- the Italian Government, by. IM Braguglia, acting as Agent, assisted by. G. Fiengo, State Advocate;
- the Commission of the European Communities, by. D. Kukovec and Mrs D. Recchia, acting as Agents,

after hearing the Advocate General at the hearing on February 10, 2009, gives the following Judgement



1. The request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article. 29, first paragraph, of June 18, 1992 Council Directive 92/50/EEC coordinating procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ L 209, p. 1). and the general principles of Community law on public procurement.

2. The question was raised in proceedings between the Assitur Srl (hereinafter 'the Assitur) and the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture of Milan, on the compatibility with the provisions and principles of the above national legislation prohibiting participation in a same procedure for the award of contract, in a separate and competing companies, among which there is a relationship in which one exercises control or significant influence over the other.

Context regulatory

Community legislation

3. Article. 29 of Directive 92/50, [now art. 45 of Directive 2005/18 - ed] out in Chapter 2 of the latter, entitled "Criteria for qualitative selection ', in its first paragraph reads as follows:

" may be excluded from any participation in a contract provider services which:

a) is in a state of bankruptcy, liquidation, receivership, composition with creditors, have suspended business activities or is in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for by applicable laws and regulations national
b) is the subject di procedimenti di dichiarazione di fallimento, di liquidazione coatta o di amministrazione controllata, di un concordato preventivo oppure di qualunque altro procedimento simile previsto dalle leggi o dai regolamenti nazionali;
c) sia stato condannato per un reato relativo alla condotta professionale di prestatore di servizi, con sentenza passata in giudicato;
d) si sia reso responsabile di gravi violazioni dei doveri professionali, provate con qualsiasi elemento documentabile dall’amministrazione [aggiudicatrice];
e) non abbia adempiuto obblighi riguardanti il pagamento dei contributi di sicurezza sociale conformemente alle disposizioni legislative del paese in cui è stabilito o di quello dell’amministrazione [aggiudicatrice];
f) has not fulfilled tax obligations in accordance with the laws of the country of the [authority];
g) is guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required under this chapter or fails to supply the information. "

4. Article. 3, No 4, second and third paragraphs of the June 14, 1993 Council Directive 93/37/EEC [now art. 63 of Directive 2005/18 - ed] the coordination of procedures for awarding public works contracts (OJ L 199, p.. 54), define the terms "associates" and "dominant influence" business. Regarding the public works concession contracts, It provides:

"Do not be regarded as third companies have been formed to obtain the concession or undertakings related to them.
"Related undertaking" means any undertaking over which the concessionaire can exert a dominant influence, directly or indirectly, or any undertaking which can exert a dominant influence [the concessionaire or which, as the concessionaire, is subject to dominant] of another undertaking by virtue of ownership, financial participation or the rules which govern it. The dominant influence is presumed when a company directly or indirectly in relation to another undertaking:
- holds a majority of the subscribed capital, or
- a majority of the votes attaching to the shares of the company, or
- can appoint more than half the members of the administrative, managerial or supervisory body. "

National legislation

5. The Directive 92/50 was transposed into Italian law by Legislative Decree 17 March 1995, No 157 (ordinary supplement to Official Gazette No 104 of May 6, 1995). This Decree does not include a ban on participation in the same procedure for the award of contract pubblico di servizi a carico di imprese tra le quali esistano rapporti di controllo o che siano tra loro collegate.

6. L’art. 10, comma 1 bis, della legge 11 febbraio 1994, n. 109, legge quadro in materia di lavori pubblici (GURI n. 41 del 19 febbraio 1994; in prosieguo: la «legge n. 109/1994»), [ora art. 34, comma 2, del decreto legislativo n. 163 del 2006 - n.d.r.] stabilisce quanto segue:

«Non possono partecipare alla medesima gara imprese che si trovino fra di loro in una delle situazioni di controllo previste dall’articolo 2359 del codice civile».

7. L’art. 2359 del codice civile italiano, intitolato «Società controllate e società collegate», è così formulato:

«Sono considerate società controllate:

1) le società in cui un’altra società dispone della maggioranza dei voti esercitabili nell’assemblea ordinaria;
2) le società in cui un’altra società dispone di voti sufficienti per esercitare un’influenza dominante nell’assemblea ordinaria;
3) le società che sono sotto influenza dominante di un’altra società in virtù di particolari vincoli contrattuali con essa.

Ai fini dell’applicazione dei numeri 1) e 2) del primo comma si computano anche i voti spettanti a società controllate, a società fiduciarie e a persona interposta; non is the voting rights on behalf of others.
are regarded as affiliated companies in which another company exercises significant influence. The influence is presumed when the ordinary can be exercised at least one-fifth or one tenth of the votes if the company's shares listed on regulated markets. "

8. The procedures for the award of public contracts in the works, services and supplies are currently governed, in their entirety, by legislative decree 12 April 2006, No 163 (Extra Ordinary Gazette No. 100 of May 2, 2006, hereinafter 'Legislative Decree No 163/2006). Article. 34, last paragraph of the decree legislation provides:

"They can not participate in the same race who are competing with each other in a relationship of control referred to in Article 2359 of the Civil Code. Contracting authorities shall also exclude competitors from the race for which ensure that its offerings are attributable to a single decision-making on the basis of unambiguous evidence. "

main proceedings and the question

9. By notice dated 30 September 2003, the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture of Milan has launched a public auction for the award, on the basis of lowest price, the courier service for pickup and delivery correspondence and other documentation on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce and its own special CedCamera company for a period corresponding to the years 2004-2006. The basic bid amount of EUR 530 000, excluding VAT.

10. A review of the documentation submitted by the parties concerned, were the tenderers, SDA Express Courier SpA ('the SDA'), the Italian Post SpA ('the Italian Post Office) el'Assitur.

11. On November 12, 2003, Assitur requested exclusion from the tendering procedure of the SDA and the Italian Post Office, because of links between these two companies.

12. An inquiry carried out in this regard from the jury found that the entire share capital was held by the SDA Securities SpA, which in turn wholly owned by the Italian Post. However, since the decree 17 March 1995, n. 157, governing the procurement of services, does not prohibit participation in the same procedure for the award against companies with a controlling relationship between them, and that the verification had not brought to light serious and consistent evidence that would allow it to believe that the principles of competition and secrecy of the deals had been violated in this case, the contracting entity, with determination of the December 2 2003, no 712, decided to award the contract to the SDA, which had submitted the lowest bid.

13. The Assitur sought annulment of this decision before the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy. It claimed that under Article. 10, paragraph 1 bis of Law 109/1994, in its opinion also applies to service contracts in the absence of other specific legislation, the contracting authority would have excluded from the tendering companies were together in a relationship of control under Article 2359 of Italian Civil Code.

14. The national court observes that Article. 10, paragraph 1 bis of Law 109/1994, which specifically governs the procurement of works, establishes a rebuttable presumption of knowability supply of the subsidiary by the parent. Consequently, economic operators concerned would not be considered by the legislature in a position to make deals that could establish the independence, professionalism and reliability you need, because they would be bound by a close community of interests. The provision that would prohibit such relationships with businesses so to participate concurrently in the same race and, in cases where it is found to be participating, these enterprises must be excluded from the procedure award. This court also notes that the concept of 'subsidiary' in Italian law is similar to that of "related company" as defined in Art. 3, No 4 of Directive 93/37.

15. The national court also notes that the Italian courts, a rule as that laid down in Art. 10, paragraph 1 bis of Law 109/1994 value of the rule of public policy, applicable in general. This rule is in fact the expression of a general principle that goes beyond the field of public works and also in the award in the services and supplies, despite the fact that, in the latter, there is no such specific provision. The legislature confirmed the jurisprudential approach with the adoption of Article. 34, last paragraph, of Legislative Decree No 163/2006, which currently governs all matters of public contracts, the latter legislation, however, is not applicable ratione temporis to this cause.

16. The court, however, is uncertain whether such an approach is compatible with the Community legal order and, in particular, with the art. 29 of Directive 92/50, as interpreted by the Court in February 9, 2006, Joined Cases C-226/04 and C-228/04, The Farm and a. (ECR. I-1347, paragraphs 21-23). That provision, which is the expression of the principle of 'favor participationis', namely the interest in that as many firms as possible take part in a tender, contains, according to that ruling, an exhaustive list of causes of exclusion from participation in a service contract. Those grounds do not include the situation of companies linked by a relationship of control or decisive influence.

17. The national court, however, considers that Article. 10, paragraph 1 bis of Law 109/1994 an expression of the principle of free competition, in that it seeks to penalize any collusion between firms under a tender procedure. Consequently, it would be adopted in strict conformity with the EC Treaty, in particular Articles. 81 et seq. the latter, and not really inconsistent with art. 29 of Directive 92/50.

18. In light of these considerations, the Lombardy Regional Administrative Court decided to stay proceedings and to refer the following question:

"If the art. 29 of Directive 92/50 (...), by providing seven grounds for exclusion from participation in service contracts, constitutes a "numerus clausus" hypothesis of impediments and thus preclude Article. 10, paragraph 1 bis of Law 109/94 (now replaced by. 34, last paragraph, of Legislative Decree No 163/06) to establish a ban on simultaneous participation in the tender for companies where there exists a relationship of control. " On the question



19. In order to answer that question, it should be noted that, according to the jurisprudence of the Court, the seven grounds for exclusion of a contractor from participating in a public contract under art. 29, first paragraph, of Directive 92/50 relating to their professional honesty, solvency and reliability of the person concerned, namely the professional qualities of the latter (See, to that effect, the House and Others., Paragraph 21).

20. The Court, with regard to art. 24, first paragraph, of Directive 93/37, which builds on the same grounds for exclusion under Article. 29, first paragraph, of Directive 92/50, stressed that the intention of the legislature was to consider this provision only in cases of exclusion related to the professional skills of those concerned. To the extent that it reproduces those grounds for exclusion, this list has been exhaustively considered by the Court (see, to that effect, December 16, 2008, Case C-213/07, Michaniki, not yet reported, paragraphs 42 and 43 and the case law cited).

21. The Court added that this list is not exhaustive, however, exclude the possibility for Member States to maintain or adopt, in addition to the grounds for exclusion, substantive rules, in particular, to ensure, in public procurement, the principles equal treatment of all bidders and transparency, which form the basis of the directives relating to the award of public contracts, provided, however, that respects the principle of proportionality (see, to that effect, Michaniki, cited ., paragraphs 44-48 and cases cited).

22. It is clear that a national legislative measures such as those at issue in this case is to avoid any possible form of collusion between the participants in the same procedure for the award of public contracts and to protect the equal treatment of candidates and the transparency of the procedure.

23. Can therefore be said that Article. 29, first paragraph, of Directive 92/50 does not preclude a Member State, in addition to the grounds of exclusion under that provision, other causes of exclusion intended to ensure compliance with the principles of equal treatment and transparency, provided that such measures do not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

24. It follows that compliance with Community law of national legislation in issue in this case must be examined again in light of the principle of proportionality.

25. In this regard, it should be noted that the Community rules on public procurement were adopted as part of the internal market, in which the free circulation and be eliminated restrictions on competition (see, to that effect , Judgement 21 February 2008 in Case C-412/04 Commission v Italy, ECR. I-619, paragraph 2).

26. In this context of a single internal market and effective competition, it is in the right Community assurances that the widest possible participation of bidders in a tender.

27. The order for reference that the provision in question in the proceedings, written in clear and definite, implies an absolute requirement for contracting authorities to exclude from the tendering companies that submit separate and competing, if such companies are linked by relations of control, such as those provided by national legislation at issue.

28. However, it would be counter to the effective application of Community law the systematic exclusion of companies that are linked together by the right to participate ad una medesima procedura di aggiudicazione di appalto pubblico. Una soluzione siffatta, infatti, ridurrebbe notevolmente la concorrenza a livello comunitario.

29. Pertanto, è giocoforza constatare che la normativa nazionale di cui trattasi nella causa principale, nella misura in cui estende il divieto di partecipazione ad una medesima procedura di aggiudicazione alle situazioni in cui il rapporto di controllo tra le imprese interessate rimane ininfluente sul comportamento di queste ultime nell’ambito di siffatte procedure, eccede quanto necessario per conseguire l’obiettivo di garantire l’applicazione dei principi di parità di trattamento e di trasparenza.

30. Una tale normativa, basata su una presunzione assoluta that the tenders submitted for the same contract by companies will necessarily have been influenced by one another, violates the principle of proportionality because it does not allow those companies the opportunity to demonstrate that, in their case, there are no real risk of occurrence of practices which jeopardize the transparency and distort competition among the bidders (see, to that effect, 3 March 2005, Joined Cases C-21/03 and C-34/03, Fabricom ECR . I-1559, paragraphs 33 and 35, and Michaniki, cit., paragraph 62).

31. In this regard it should be noted that clusters can have different forms and objectives, and do not necessarily exclude subsidiaries that enjoy a certain autonomy in the management of their commercial policy and their economic activities, particularly in the area of \u200b\u200bparticipation in public auctions. Moreover, as the Commission noted in its written observations, the relationship between enterprises of the same group may be governed by special provisions, such as type of contract, to ensure both the independence and confidentiality in the preparation of offers be submitted simultaneously by the companies within the same tender.

32. In this context, the task of determining whether the relationship of control at issue influenced sul contenuto delle rispettive offerte depositate dalle imprese interessate nell’ambito di una stessa procedura di aggiudicazione pubblica richiede un esame e una valutazione dei fatti che spetta alle amministrazioni aggiudicatrici effettuare. La constatazione di un’influenza siffatta, in qualunque forma, è sufficiente per escludere tali imprese dalla procedura di cui trattasi. Per contro, la semplice constatazione dell’esistenza di un rapporto di controllo tra le imprese considerate, risultante dall’assetto proprietario o dal numero dei diritti di voto che possono esercitarsi nelle assemblee ordinarie, non è sufficiente affinché l’amministrazione aggiudicatrice possa escludere automaticamente tali imprese dalla procedura di award, regardless of whether such a relationship had a real impact on their conduct in this procedure.

33. In light of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is as follows:

- art. 29, first paragraph, of Directive 92/50 must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State, in addition to the grounds of exclusion under that provision, other causes of exclusion intended to ensure compliance with the principles of equality treatment and transparency, provided that such measures do not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective, and
- Community law precludes a national provision which, while pursuing the legitimate objectives of equal treatment of tenderers and of transparency in procedures for the award of public contracts, establish an absolute prohibition against companies in which there is a relationship of control or which are linked together, take part in simultaneous and competing for the same tender, without allowing them an opportunity to demonstrate that the relationship did not influence their behavior within that race.

Costs

34. For those parties in the main, these proceedings are a step before the national court, which is responsible for the decision on costs. The costs incurred by other parties to submit comments to the Court are not recoverable.

For these reasons, the Court (Fourth Chamber) hereby rules: Article

. 29, first paragraph, of June 18, 1992 Council Directive 92/50/EEC coordinating procedures for the award of public service should be interpreted as not precluding a Member State, in addition to the grounds exclusion under that provision, other causes of exclusion intended to ensure compliance with the principles of equal treatment and transparency, provided that such measures do not exceed what necessary to achieve that objective.

Community law precludes a national provision which, while pursuing the legitimate objectives of equal treatment of tenderers and of transparency in procedures for the award of public contracts, establish an absolute prohibition against companies among which there a relationship of control or which are linked together, take part in simultaneous and competing for the same tender, without allowing them an opportunity to demonstrate that the relationship did not influence their behavior in this race .

Signatures